Laegna

Steve AI

Awesome videos

https://app.steve.ai/video/JUTVBWAXQTE41BV9

Tambet Väli

Share your videos with friends, family, and the world

https://www.youtube.com/@TambetV%C3%A4li

• This document itself is introduction to Laegna, and Spireason or Laegna Spireason. It wants to build the important theorems, parts in special blocks with Lamps in Notion.so interface; it removes the complexities and reduces it into theorems, introductions to related materials - also rather simplistic, or in case of Tao and I Ching only the simplistic view of factual material of having 4 related symbols is used, not necessarily the full deep content in first place. Theorems are surrounded by related materials. While Laegna is the basis for Logecs and Linguistic enchancements of Language to support 4-based logic and related linguistic structures; Spireason is reasoning inpired by Laegna math and intellectuality, and connecting spirituality with reason. In this document, the spiritual reasoning creates a small model world of theorem framework, where it does not “know” what is not available for the first basic introduction. For example, we don’t know in this part, whether consciousness exists, because based on even human structure of atoms and electrons, we don’t see any clear attribute to just prove this in terms of simple “squares of logic and circles of math”; so this is the introduction and here we “know” rather Laegna basics, and for proofs we build very simple machines. As this is not any deep search for consciousness, but rather the theorematic framework which appeared when simplifying something complex and reducing it to rather trivial information, not losing it’s balance but having an “axiomatic system” - some base theorems, lamped blocks, explained around with necessary background even from western rather pre-Laegna philosophy, mystics and logic; the skeleton or back-bone appears here. Leaving out the complexities of math and life, this should be pre-school thing which even children would understand; for example simulated machines are simple and can be replaced with cartoons, movies or stories, where the deduction is simple and it’s rather illustrated well, than filled with all the reasons - I don’t see why you cannot express so simple thing with illustrations and a few words, or why I could not understand the theorem of karma and nature of life when pre-school. Also, these things here could be quite directly translated to Coq or Isabelle, as they lack some deep content, and look like proofs of meaning of life or other things, which rather follow theorems of biology, of systems, than deep introspections of nature of consciousness. One proof, also, instead of heavy numbers tends to contain one or oppose two conceptions, with two or three additional details, and so simple systems could be understood by children as base of their lessons. Spireason basics, being so simple could be so trivially come from Logecs that it’s also base theory of Laegna - but still, Laegna is also a free system of math and language, where specific proofs could be replaced with better proofs and more decent theories without any part of the language itself getting lost.

• “Welcome to Spireason!” - this is a list of articles here, which are part of my Spireasons website. This website is for intelligent or genius, where normal users cannot read a sentence very clearly and tend to express this. This is the “genius” of me, where I wrote deep, compressed text in mode of heavy contemplation, and while this time I am not so sure it does not matter whether consciousness exists - I do enter the rather mystical world and while it’s mostly scientifically corrects, there are also intuitive contemplations, which have to be worded clearly to give the right level of assertiveness and doubt. The website is closed for new documents as this is the complete set of something I wanted to express; each document has like a “diagonal” line I envisioned, to completely give you one full idea; ideas together contribute a balanced, good introduction, and deeper and more spiritual than the base logical introduction in this file; whereas, theorems in this text are very good background to read those texts in their deeper advancement.
• “Laegna Base Alphabet” is another essential part of Laegna, introducing the letters, their combinatorics and it’s relations to number, geometrical and imaginative space. There, the most core definitions of numbers and letter meanings, as well as definitions to analyze any Laegna word through it’s base matrix (”scientific numerology” of Laegna) and psychological implications. Where different Laegna systems are numerically different, a normalized number would have standardized psychological consequences, such as EEE or EEEE looking like very good situation, where their numeric value can vary depending on operations you can do with coordinate systems and number representations. Any number is simultaneously a number (constant value where the name defines the value) and a variable - the digits appear normally, as in “aa” would be two digits of “a”, and as such mean a minimum number possible with precision of two digits, where you can divide positive numbers into 4 and thus, it spans 1/4 lower area of the number or points to it’s lower end, being equal to “a”, “aaa”, but with different level of preciseness as “aaaa” would have 1/16 area at the bottom, closer to zero (continuous number) or one (discrete Laegna number), while the point location at the bottom is still the same limit, basically zero, but as Laegna numbers have point acceleration (Theorem: if a number is continuously curved, implicatively each point is curved); here the Gauss system would measure the limits of angles, but when the points must have point-static velocity, acceleration and any parameter, being one digit like 0 instead of two digits like Aa around null, which is the lower limit of positive numbers with precision R=2 (R is normally the container area of the number and computations with it affect the number space in the same direction, not opposite as it numerically creates a mirage as space coordinates being reflected to object coordinates in it, which can ruin the mathematics if you have fluctuations of random reflectiations in the actual number format; for this, subsequentially, R=T which means number and it’s axe are not in opposite direction, nor does the complete space coordinate differ from actual position in any measure of distance, direction, or even numeric value if you are able to carry the object- or concept-based R and L (another opposite of R, which will choose it’s direction based on it’s relation to L, not T, now, which means opposites in Laegna are not binary, static pairs, but inherent dynamics of dispositions and relations) calculation to the end with either R or L container - indeed, you can calculate L as rather global number, which means you make a space-separated list of infinity [perhaps short, discrete infinity] of R coordinates or object values in R container, and L would then be this object as seen from higher octave, where it looks like an average of the numbers, but you can have same number of digits as in original numbers, componentize it back to original object system or unitary framework, and now the L values are in R container - in your left-wing, socialist, communist or for example polite, diplomatic, business-friendly attitude, or professional ambient appearing in the office; each of given examples is L value as it’s not made in direct exchange of energies between specific persons, but a professional keeps holistic image of the business and progresses towards it’s legal, rich and highly (business low class could have low taste of pleasures) enjoyable / pleasurable ambient; this means they are collaboratively sharing the resources, such as opening a door without getting definite equivalent value in the short time from the same person). L exists in time and space - you have some sharings with your future and past selves with their resources, work and potentials or investment values “from” the future altering it’s current values in more realistic terms (wrongly attributing the future and past and present success creates a “loan”, where you can sense futurism, currentism, outdatedness, in the way that the balancing of loan values appears in each direction and a decent science would work better, than past science, and use of might be more realistic than use of potential future sciences; but then in logical system you move in time, and subsequently meet different people, conditions and places). For example if you destroy a person, who wants to give you good idea for a life, innovative practical solution for your business, but you do not engage but destroy the person for appearing better than you, there would be instant karmic consequences in terms of money. The real, present value accounts for all it’s interactions of past, of future, of you and of the environment, and it’s actual value can be different from it’s written value, so that it shifts to negotive (I or Ì would ignore and destroy useful values, have lower price or payback than actual price or payback, where rare case of Í would be dangerous achievement like climb mount everest, which you get awarded for the first time of history, your life or your local group without other alternatives; the Í value then shifts to O as the coordinate system would extend with accepting numbers of longer digits into the countable sphere of it’s precision level, which means your root chakra frequency is raising; normally you would do just a forest trip and survive some cold air and the crazy dangerous thing would be nettles, which might be how you do it instead of climbing to Mount Everest, especially for the first time) or posetive (E or È - altough E is sometimes in place of É as non-accented symbols use the surrounding accents and context of the sentence, even the listener’s attitude who might be risk-taker or a risk-averse person - would advertise non-useful values, believe in unrecognized / undeserved sucess, have higher price or payback or estimation than actual price or payback or estimation; here É means grand success, which is rather not draining and temporary experience for long recovering, like a marathon would be for many, but it’s the direct source of luck such as earning your first million in business-unfriendly environment, but then rather within the good frames of your house, car, salary and wife to be completely ÉÉÉÉÉ, where sometimes you write each digit sentence of correlated numbers into one number, and projecting a cycle pattern of local XYZ shifts, zoom them into normalized coordinates - XYZ, while able to move a number globally, are mathematically trivially - in other words, small case xyz to discriminate - able to create pattern of each digit having it’s little XYZ component of frequency or time-attitude shift, where the big axe of XYZ would still exist and create a constant shift factor for these values, for example past evolutionary phase has more Z values of rather future-becoming, where our creative genius has rather Y values of rather being now in the past of their actual knowledge state / stage; the system for digitizing in terms of rather information units than their linear symmetries means that while Mathematecs is fine for their number representation, the complexity of the digits is rather handled in Logecs, which sees just a sequence of truth values where mathematecs sees a complex spatial and numeral multiplier for the number, which is elegant for calculations but not easy for defining your number freely).. well in short: you make depts and paybacks in R of your own life, it’s timeline of current reincarnation or all reincarnations (buddhist, spiritual) or sources (atheist); you do it in social sphere where the dept and payback is with other people; and you do it in history where the karma relates to your influence of time and it’s back-influence on you; in each case, the mathematical value’s ability to be equal with itself will change.

• The rest of texts:
• With help of AI, adding additional texts, I made more readable and fluent materials. Where the same topic is repeated with different readability and intelligence rate, an AI can analyze them, draw parallels and deduce the meaning from variety of representations, gaining good knowledge; for example, based on this it can explain the website - the website is structured actually into “simple” and “complex” part, where the same documents, mostly, are repeated with two levels of complexity, where simpler can explain the more complex and the more complex can create rather wholistic image of something structured.
• The protection of Laegna genius:
• My genius is little pained for the feedback of more traditional minds. I think, if Laegna is going to open the minds, everybody is genius - achieving something the ones who did not like my philosophy and did not come the long journey with us, the philosophers of this generation; they would feel left out and create the Posetive state, Negotive to us (Laegna truth values) - posetive is fakery, but negotive is fakery once one understands this; posetive is the effect on others, who wanted better but were suspressed, starting to go and dreaming of better story; posetive is the extent by which they overestimated them, or by which assumption of the natural flow without obstacle could be overestimating the situation.
• Socrates story of this part resembles how the world sees, when we go deeper and their learnt habits are endangered. Throughout my life I am more and more sure that this effect is substantial and the french revolution, nietzhe or cogress of vienna did not stop this. In this story the old generation goes into posetive - as good people in Position go straight, but entering on Position, come out in Posetion of their original value, you can also say Roposetion or Rosedriad, where this happens on R - your value changes with the space moving - and not T - that you fall yourself, changing your logic to have different assumptions.
• Fairy tales of similar situations of societies going to posetive, where the roles change and one can see significant means to Laegna - old men, once Position now turn into Posetion by Rosedriad or Roposetion, without changes in them, but the change reflect the changing world, the context (which is rather “driad” or “ro” - R meaning the space or the context, and o means “basis” or here, “logic” as it’s own second digit after “l” is “o” (+ “gecs”🙂)); in these stories, people go into posetions, and when resolving to positions the posetions solve, and Laegna logecs describes it well while with binary “true” and “false”, nothing specifically logical happens to explain it clearly in primitive terms or tautologies. By this, Laegna is powerful in expressing life in terms of logic - the logex machine of life simulations (to be created to have more proofs here with programs; I have simulated only some variables and rather the results are trivial, mentally understandable). Posetion and Power of Negative thought are also described, with connections to life, in separate document - it’s rather clear how Negative and Negotive affect our lifes, but how Posetive can be fatal and not just failure of Position is important; indeed it’s visible it’s only a matter of losing some opportunity to turn Position into Posetion; and if it’s by evil will or deeds, the evil one is at the Negotion position, whereas you have to solve the appearing Position - Negotion, often, is the force not meant to be on that position, which relatively turns another, better will, into posetion; as the same kind of collective fall would be posetion for those, who wanted better, and negation by those, who followed the outdated and weak manner. Sinus, related meditations, even the explanation of spiritual war, where one plays, by signs, the negative situations in symbols against your mistake and at the same time rewards the synergistic move by love - in diplomatic view of reflecting both position and negation, posetion and negotion, to outlooks, which appear real in reality and bring the actual reality closer where it would take time, still being respectful. This is the attitude similar to old one, but as I grow I see it in bigger intensity.
• I will add more documents.

Basis of 2, 4 and 16

Laegna Language

Mysteries of Laegna

Tao

Laegna Symbol of Taú:
- Blue: Represents E, whatever it’s now but in infinity, it’s meaningful - like a corporation, with all their legal cases and even wars, finally they reason this with success and things becoming more civilized, and more rich; in blue, they Keep Their Vision High. White circle inside the black is the blue; even through difficulties, you can target the spot of eternal life shining though infinity, and follow it a step closer.
- Yellow: Represents I, which can be pleasure now but in infinity you find out it’s sensory desire, temporary joy you are going to remove in advanced steps of your Buddhist teaching; indeed a Christian or Atheist necessarily sees the Yellow in Action also as Negotive or Negative trait, depending on whether they have Neglected it.
- Green: This is the local good, where you Live Naturally; each of your steps well fitting the next step as far as you can see. As you resolve the bigger picture, it can become slightly off, getting a degree of yellow.
- Red: This is a bad thing, but it can also be an adventure or Deep Night of the Soul; or you can do fasting, which is lack of trivial energy, food, but it can be a source of deeper energy.
While these are the four basic colors, we also have some chaos in the color theory:

• Purple / Violet (Beyond Blue) – The additional color that exists between red and blue but can’t be fully represented by standard RGB.

• Yellow-Green / Lime-Green (Beyond Green) – This is a color that is between yellow and green in the visible spectrum, but it can’t be directly produced by typical RGB devices.

Indeed, this complexity seems to appear in infinity, and you should consider what this means to symbols and colors - where you can break out from four basic colors and see that Laegna is not thinking in box, but the box leaves you into ponegation, neglection, new meanings and correlations in infinity.
To draw a simple symbol of Laegna you draw the yinyang with these colors, and you have expressed Laegna four. Remove the little circles to draw two, and add another Tao in terms of coordinate systems to express complex numbers (well the other one is not me as author of Laegna, but as user who would extend it by inspiration, remaining in the formal borders and limitations - otherwise it’s “non-normalized Laegna”, where you freely use it’s seed properties, the algorithm, which creates a Laegna language; but in the normalized Laegna, this infinity of possibilities is replaced with small set of symbols able to express most of it, except the freedom of drafting and the creative quality of logos and surrealistic drawings, or other contributions where you pay more attention and are aware of the nuances, unlike normalized language you should be able to read fast, finding the ones you already analyzed and learnt, even within simple combinations and implications or prerequisites).

To extend Laegna Taú symbol to 6, to U and V, around blue which represents white you draw the white half-circle, where around yellow there is the black half-circle; when context is black or white or otherwise disturbing you, in here and in other logos where it would be blue or yellow, you use opposite-coloured or context sensitive borders and take care that the logo visibly still forms a circle and is recognized in more or less it’s original form, not as a drop of water around some bacteria, for example.

Chinese, indeed, inspired and required me to solve the Tao, or rather many series of Taos, and thus their Symbol must be indeed left into Laegna forever, so that it’s hard to study it without contemplating on the classical basis or inspiration, fluently integrating into mine. For this reason, you can also paint “Laegna dragons”, which might have a distinct style from Chinese, and do other Tao animations - but with four colors, the space might a little bit more complex or different -; and think what creates an unique Laegna style.

Typical ethics is “idealistic”, labelling everybody as friends and enemies and measuring this based on total calculation, equal to everybody - it’s found measuring large bodies of human masses as wholes, and taking averages; in Laegna Math, averages are not taken and “friends” or “enemies” becomes complexes, where everybody is your friend or enemy in some aspects, and while healing the enemies or resolving their conflicts, in the same person you are loving your friend. More fluid karmic flow, mathematically, means more love - in this solution there is love, because love is when there are for example objects or persons 1, 2, 3, each radiating 1 unit of energy; if they manage to integrate their solutions in a way that one person is not working more, but it comes from group dynamics, the more is more than the sum of the less; love is the factor by which the collective vibration becomes higher without involving the personal work for the personal vibration to become higher in a degree, which would explain this change; resolving major factors, which make the calculations about many people depend negatively on their group settings in a way; where the original situation would be initially “normal”, the degree of such change, and it’s ability to continue infinitely, marks that this equation is a form of love.

I Ching

In Relation:

There are many different changes, but Laegna is not made to express every single change with another number or symbol, but to contain enough transformations and operations to use the 4 letters. 4 letters is optimized number for combinatorics, providing us with something graspable, and for human it’s easier to learn related conditions of known numbers, than learning new symbols relating to new concepts. In classical mathematics, numbers can have different units, and we play many positional games, or in indexes and special notations, for example binary file could be seen as single, big number - the meanings of numbers are constantly shifting. Laegna tries to systematize those approaches and while you can freely play with numbers, which are nothing about reality, but abstract (see Jung) things, which can be composed with units and other substances, as well as coordinate systems and transformations - then, the number does not convey a specific, first-hand meaning, but rather it has certain qualities on it’s own, which can be used to compose meaningful systems and approaches, frameworks. For example in programming, for boolean, which is either 0 or 1, or byte, one can assign opposites, indexes, and many other real-world entities and relations, and in process they are free from the rules; for example, while index might be a number, it might not make any actual sense to implement add and substract operations on it - which is indeed useful where there is specific order of numbers.

Where this imaginary world tends to end - drafting or logo-designing with infinite possibilities, in normal Laegna connections where all the rules about lines, shapes, colors, sounds etc. are unlimited; usually given scenarios can all be implemented with small numbers of sets; such as orders of basic numbers can be invented as many as all combinations of them, or in infinities, even “more” - but usually two important orders are enough, in normalized text, to grasp those properties into structures and relations one can study to find the theorems, not to constantly do different combinations. Then, numbers still have some inherit qualities. In decimal system as well - when one can assign different meanings to numbers; once you need ordered set of positions, for example, it’s common to use standard decimal order and not to invent a special value for specific hashes or unique index combinations you can make of digits; so, when the normalized form is found from reality, imagination is closed and after all the free play of unlimited form: for publishing or representing, one uses rather standard symbols, orders and relations; one uses calligraphy for logos, first letters, or titles and texts in specific images; one uses a few very special signs in one text, not more than one or two accented letters per a few words - and, mostly the standard alphabet is used; Laegna alphabet contains some special letters, which are also used with care; for example zeta is larger than normal letter and needs special space, and while it represents important conception, the meaning is actually replaced with some combination of X, Y and Z; with the fancy letter being rather a gateway or port, and not something you want to read fast in normal text.

Thus: while O and A represent the static view of reality; I and E represent the changes. Actual combinations are many, thus in many ways can we write I Ching hexagrams once we freely do all the transformations of math; here given representation is still simplest, where a position and change are encoded in a way, which corresponds to I Ching one-to-one, and is perfectly understandable in Laegna.

Example in an I Ching Hexagram:

• Hexagram 1 (The Creative): All lines are yang (A A A A A A).

• Hexagram 2 (The Receptive): All lines are yin (O O O O O O).

• Hexagram 11 (Peace): This would have lines like A A A O O O—showing a mix of yang and yin.

In simplified form, some hexagrams make sense if “AAA” is replaced by “A”, and “OOO” is replaced by “O” - dividing number length by three is an unitary operation of Laegna, almost whole number (actually rational, division of whole numbers) transformation; here it would simplify the thing and you would find “OO”, “AA” etc. symbols in the corners of I Ching; well you can use this kind of I Ching perhaps in a children book or simplified image, where four lines is like a symbol of having the whole I Ching visible. But also, you can exercise to feel those sounds, and look at the shapes - where O is closed, like sub-zero number, into it’s own space of introvercy, and “A” is in it’s perfect position in the middle of infinity and zero, upper and lower sides of the letter, with no particular direction but a multiplier of similar facts putting the central line into it’s perceived position. While roundness of O makes it rather finite, sharp corners of A relate it’s Truth to something infinite. This analysis is based on: Laegna is holistic integral of language, form and math and logic, and where you cannot notice a certain rule why those transformations on different aspects seem to always fit, they are not components with clear meaning, but the system is made with it’s big picture in mind, and number or letter or word behaves as something appearing from those different conceptions creating something meaningful in every combination, where the traits and properties randomly fit - where there is no single theorem about that, but usually you don’t get it really “wrong”, the result of using random theorems and aspects for combinations and expecting them to magically fall into synchronized union rather than looking specific theorems about synchronizing those aspects. This is a kind of poetry - whatever meaning you give to poem, it’s inspiring and makes as much sense, so it’s not practically about something specific, but rather an archetype or symbol being in many contexts and places, giving different impressions, but somehow not becoming illogical.

Estonian-Laegna connotiation of simple letters is quite straightforward: in “aa” or “ahaa”, “oo” or “ohoo”, “ee” or “ehee”, and “ihii”, even “uhuu” or “uu” (looking for someone) one finds the laegna numbers fit; in english “ih”, “oh”, “ah”, “eh” and “uh” are similarly having as strong connection. Estonia is not having “ii” in standard body of language understanding, but in Laegna also there are certain doubts about using very negative, fatal energies in your sounds, unless you are very creative with the sinus; indeed if “ii” is said an Estonian would understand the fact, but there is certain tension about doing the weird, non-linguistic sounds which only mean that they mean nothing; one would not like to involve you in an important connotiation or responsibility if you sound typically like this; rather you would feel something extensively insulting in how people look and avoid you, even if they cannot explain their exact trouble nor find you exactly on their way - it’s like having a source of noice, while it takes time to hate it, usually you want to put it into some separated area, like into distinct place of city for factories and warehouses, where smoke, noice and other things do not resemble the normal flow of the city, even if it’s hard to say “guilty”. In this, Laegna attributes “ii” the same way, but is also able to analyze it mathematically and semantically, and address with it’s sinus structure - but, most people would kind of attack you and please to remove the bad sounds from public places, even little bit suspicious finding out you sound like this alone in your home; because maybe it affects your energies like mantra.

Alchemy

• Motion is what happens in normal, non-alchemical physics, with “dead bodies” as we can see them in this integral; even our brain, and what we perceive as soul, in this paradigm we can only see it as “dead bodies” or “quantum electrons” (well paraphrasing).

• “E” is a letter, which reminds of targeting the better position, now posetion, to be achieved in future.

• The initial “seed laws” form many patterns, giving evolution an infinite base creativity of forms; still lacking the long-term vision whether those forms are sound or they lack any stability. These seed laws are described in non-alchemical physics and align with letters “O” and “A”, where “I” and “E” create complex patterns, and unlike primitive, “physical” oscillations, the complex patterns like life are not so directly measurable in their basic properties; any relation in Cosmos can create more complexities and our basic theories do not naturally extend very well.

• Where emotion can be seen as intelligent process, outside the scope of love, it’s natural intelligence of couples, or higher love, implying also the bigger theme of making relationships, planning them over generations and responding to past evolution - it’s intelligent process where you look it like cycles of a wheel; where in short-term, the “good might not win”, and the oscillation is non-harmonic, destructive, on very low material level non-ethical; in cycles of evolution, which are measured not on continuous line but counting the points of decisions and problems; yin and yang appear - each points connects to past and future; and the logic appears on higher level. Once you transform it to actual logic on scale, where it seems to happen smoothly, you can see it’s “intent” or the actual “logic machine”. Deep Learning, the perceptron, while it has many logical laws like the harmonic nature of matrix, a balanced combination of possible pairs - it can be seen as evolution through almost random mutations, which really appear in optimization algorithms; here, we might doubt whether it “thinks” or “has intention” - but actually it would converge to the limit, and lack of randomness or evolution can get it stuck to local optimums, where it’s “dead matter” properties or non-convergence, having no emotion or goal are trivial.

• In Laegna language, we want different forms of words, but not different words to have the evolutionary, instinctual, and conscious levels covered. Naturally, the world combines into intelligence and creation, and repeated evolutionary steps simplify; indeed the goal is Truth - one oscillation, which does not want to escape itself, but will rather optimize to remain. Over time, initial O and A of avoided and preferred situations are changed by I and E; where E provides the goal for a motion. Thus, while it might be non-aware, non-perceiving or lacking real cognitive abilities, or perhaps having only rudimentary ones (we don’t know whether the complexity and structure of matter resolves dead matter into living process, or the emotions have “perceptrons”, primitive basis which might not be aware of themselves feeling, but have some fusion of feeling-like qualities; while it’s hard to see, why matter should instantly gain some atoms or electrons of life-like qualities, and human might not recognize them perfectly, but really we see that while local optimums of physical laws create the T aspect, the local aspect of valid theorems, and as Negations, those initial states of matter are not inherently wrong and nobody is suggesting to close your eyes from them; within R aspect we also get Negotions and Posetions, which under many evolutionary cycles show us the actual equilibrum is different from initial condition.

Thermodynamics

• There is an energy in “dead matter” (physics), or good and bad energy in “living matter” (alchemy, with the law of imperfection). Universe as a whole is like thermos system, containing some energy, and all the bodies we can form in certain manners would be containers of some energy, keeping it with them like a thermos.

• There is a dynamics, where the energy is moving, and forming ecosystems; conceptions like batteries, business etc. come into play.

• In infinity and superpositions, additional rule appears: the superposition covers numerous possible combinations, some better than others; for good and bad energy, which constitutes also of structure not only the raw force, it’s important to notice that the good potentials are magic spheres for energy inflow, the Position dynamics, where from the bad potentials there is flow of experience of avoiding them, the Negation dynamics. While organization of matter would change between potential and kinetic forms, or in other matters, and the conservation law does not seem complete - this happens in coordinate system of velocity, of constant speeds; when we look at acceleration, which appears in infinity and creates life, the complex combinations, the stable amount of growth is zero-point (not absolute zero at bottom, but relative zero in the middle), and in terms of possibilities and outcomes, the most fundamental principles restore the laws of thermodynamics in high degree - we can see fundamental causes reappearing and even a creative creature of mind, where it’s hard to formulate the 4 laws in absolute numbers, but they are in exchange and transformation of energy, and the “goal” producing “emotions” (seek, avoid, in lifeless terms to not make many assumptions) turns the situations into bodies creating circular economy. While the quantum physics, when we fit it into our psychology, is hardly able to create some vague parallels where our mind might use one or another property, but we cannot easily reach the concrete numbers and cases or some trivial and axiomatic science to be used outside the scope of heavy, constant creativity and understanding; the principles of thermodynamics, of creatures and bodies on way to equilibrea carrying energy, seeking for higher-energy equilibrum and forming fractal of larger bodies, finally a “thermodynamic” universe having one acceleration constant of energy, which has a constant factor of inflow from potential field; this is so complex non-linearity that indeed, the numbers need to be a bit dynamic or “ponegative”, and indeed we still use creativity to sense the complex patterns so it’s not solely “material” or trivial, repeating pattern; rather there are very complex stories which do not repeat in a way to allow trivial reproduction. Where the complex and creative spiral would not reproduce each pattern, but rather some basic consistent laws or metascience, indeed the science of measuring it gets closer to spiritualism (to be more aware of complex patterns), metaphysics (to still concieve the order, as in math of chaos which still is able to form some axioms or high correlations of non-trivial truth) or philosophy (which is very friendly to unknown and manages to remove assumptions and base the science on things, which are not much affected by infinite possibilities of reality, future and creativity, where each measure of reality would create also a better reality unless it’s hidden into oracle of poetic truth, and so the dog would not easily catch their tail - here, theorem of incompleteness is important that we don’t live in the final truth).

• In Christianity, from Earth to Heaven, in any situation or imaginable possibility, we create energy exchange, and union to grow collective energy, so this system does not lack the thermodynamic laws: we are very interested in the fact that energy does not flow in freely, rather it forms a dynamics between “thermos” of human body or social structure, which contains the energy. This is termed “goodness”, or “truth” and “power”, where “truth” is the favourable situation and “power” is the resolution of goal, the foundation, from the basic senseless input, the absolute - which is not so good but tortures us with unavoidable mathematical, logical and physical laws, which we do not know in every case, but which definitely tend to ruin our plans through imperfection we cannot avoid.

• In Buddhism, the laws of karma remind us that it’s a thermodynamic system, where we do not float in our imagination whatever we want, but we constantly struggle in lacking energy, we form thermosystems to keep it and dynamos to keep the karmic cycles; and the Nature at it’s best is answering with the same.

• In Science, thermodynamics is the physical assumption, where the business laws, ethics, laws of creating constitutional laws or more deeply even interpreting and creating the constitution itself; all those are implied by thermodynamic systems, not the ideal systems which simply solve the perfect condition, resolve into it immediately and lack nothing - then, the Universe would indeed to fast and perfect calculation for the ultimate bliss, just jump into this situation being completely mind over matter (indeed, it would develop intelligence and creativity in the same moment with all the other things), and we would not have karmic dependence of our deeds, christian needs to share the resources and contributions collectively, and financial laws, ethics or legality and constitution - those all handle the flows of different forms of energy. In posetive form, people tend to “believe” in this ideal as it trivially resembles a “Truth” - it’s the foundational truth, the final result, but in reality “Truth” is closer to a slow progress and obstacles, and law of imperfection, while seeming trivial, is hard to see existing in every thermodynamic system, which does not get instant, free and infinite energy for solving in the same moment it was born in - we would lack emotions of “good” and “bad”, the “search” and “avoidance”, “attraction” and “distraction”, but we would rather flow in straight, steady direction of ever-enjoyable oscillation; here, I don’t like if you are only doing the meditations of “visualization of bliss”, because while you need to feel the futuristic motives, but Posetive is a complex situation and while your abilities are not growing in acceleration of mind, you rather remain in here and now, somehow circulating the Positions and Negations of your lively things. Young idealists clearly want to remain under this Tree of Life, telling us to jump into Gardens of Eden in one, clear instant - actually, the childhood situation is id, where this bliss is rather given than the result of our work; and in state of ego we live in constant imperfection, sin flowing out of everywhere, and we should be just relaxed about this imperfection and the rebelling nature of the youth - in state of superego, the Y, indeed we have gained some wisdom and we are more relaxed and natural, living the actual reality.

• In Shamanic cultures, there were not so many grand themes of ethical framework, but short stories they were able to see - indeed they saw that those stories, while they can end in “good” and “bad” way, are supposed to end in a “good” way and it’s quite an active, strong and successful way, with at least slight advantage to win a war or peacetime competition, even to cure it’s enemies and make them win as well, even if not that much like naturally pure intent.

• While we can discuss philosophy without end, we can see all four examples result in quite similar rules through termodynamics - for example, Christian, Buddhist, Atheist and Shamanistic believer all believe in similar energy forms, like “food”, and make examples of sharing and growing food; where the philosophical differences are similar to differences of food - your taste or habit might be different, but you would enjoy different kinds of foods and a person from another belief system could resolve your energy system failures with food they definitely understand.

• Evolution really does not care to create, it’s not inductive, but it deductively still creates and “thinks” of better solutions - higher energy, the inflow.

• Life becomes inductive, instead of disqualifying the wrong results and creating myriads of random forms, it starts to learn from the good, qualifying the processes heading up.

Theorem of Imperfection

Imperfections in Buddhism, Christianity; or in general human understanding

• Meditating, how much is common between religions, and between religions and non-religions, one would create a big general framework of goodness.

• It’s visible that then, when one finds the wordings, and shares the equivalent conceptions so that an atheist, for example, can be seen as a “follower of God”, where “God” is defined by the practical outcomes first.

• One can doubt in synergy between religions, but the Laegna conception: for example each religion, including an atheist, learned to eat. Food, especially sharing the food or growing it, is generally seen as good and accepted; and hardly we can see cases where someone is making insulting sculptures of food; rather both religious and atheist consider food as “holy”. This is not because of their philosophical background and different ideas, but because of experience - where philosophies are multifaceted and the final truth follows the law of growth of entropy very well as we easily get interested in even deeper solution and heavier inquiry, banning things we could trust even for small incompabilities where we used to recognize them fully; the case is that experience and experiment will synchronize each paradigm to reality in regards of facts, and where you can have Buddhist experience and find energy in food, you can have Atheist experience, finding still vitamins and energy; you can notice that when they are easily fighting about the word “energy”, and when I repeated it twice not many would say it was just the same word - but where philosophy is the realm of doubting connections, the reality with it’s simple pain of hungry stomach would break through the heaviest philosophies and still make it even holy (where an atheist has concentration, talking, behavioral rules very often around food, usually associated with rather religious people; for example some people cannot accept talking when eating; what is usually religious, is here rather practical - a complex around practical people).

Imperfection of Buddha

1. Impermanence (Anicca): All things are in constant flux and change.

2. Suffering (Dukkha): Life involves inherent dissatisfaction, pain, and imperfection.

3. Non-self (Anatta): There is no permanent, unchanging self or soul.

4. Interdependence (Pratītyasamutpāda): All phenomena arise due to causes and conditions, meaning nothing exists independently.

5. Attachment Leads to Suffering: Clinging to impermanent things creates suffering.

6. Change Is Inevitable: Everything, good or bad, will eventually transform.

Imperfection of Christ

The Duality of Perfection and Imperfection: A Christian and Buddhist Reflection

In both the Christian and Buddhist traditions, the concept of imperfection is ever-present, embodied in the interplay between God and Satan, Good and Evil, Angels and Demons. Buddhism teaches that impermanence (Anicca) and suffering (Dukkha) are integral to existence, reminding us that all things are in flux and that true perfection lies beyond worldly attachments. Christianity mirrors this in its recognition of the Truth and Power of God and His angels—principles of strength and wisdom. Their karmic effect is clear: reward for living in harmony with divine law.

On the opposite side, Satan and evil angels represent Stupidity and Weakness. Just as the Buddhist law of Dukkha reflects the suffering caused by attachment and ignorance, so too does the Christian belief in the punishment that follows from evil actions. The karmic consequences of such choices are inevitable losses—whether spiritual, mental, or emotional, stemming from the degenerative nature of sin.

Thus, the laws of imperfection manifest across both faiths: the perfection of God, His angels, and their divine law brings reward; whereas the imperfection of Satan, evil angels, and the wrong path brings inevitable suffering. Both traditions affirm that imperfection exists, and through this struggle, we grow toward ultimate truth.

Imperfection of Jews

The Kabbalistic Theorems of Polarity and Cycles: A Reflection

In Kabbalistic thought, there are two key theorems that reflect the eternal dance between light and darkness, good and evil, and the natural ebb and flow of existence.

The Polarity of Intentions:

• "Around any good intent, an equal opposite bad appears as polarity."
  This reflects the law of impermanence (Anicca) and duality in both the Buddhist and Christian frameworks. In Buddhism, the principle of dukkha reveals that even in moments of good intention, suffering and challenges will inevitably arise, as everything is subject to change and impermanence. The Christian tradition mirrors this concept through the understanding that even the path of righteousness must confront temptation and sin (Satan’s influence) as part of the human experience. The Kabbalistic view suggests that any action, no matter how virtuous, must contend with its opposite—a reminder of the need for balance, wisdom, and continual growth.

The Cycle of Day and Night:

• "There is day, and there is night; this is a natural cycle."
  The natural cycle of light and darkness aligns deeply with Buddhist teachings of impermanence and interdependence. Just as suffering (dukkha) exists in a world where day turns to night, light must fade for darkness to appear, and vice versa. Christianity, too, acknowledges the Deep Night of the Soul, where even the faithful may undergo spiritual darkness and despair, knowing that the dawn will follow. This mirrors the understanding that hardship is part of the natural rhythm of life. Both the Kabbalistic and Buddhist perspectives emphasize that these cycles are not just inevitable but essential for transformation and spiritual awakening.

Imperfection of Hermetics

The Kybalion and the Law of Polarity: Imperfection in Duality

In the Kybalion, the Law of Polarity teaches that everything exists in opposites, and these opposites are merely different degrees of the same thing. The idea that bad comes before good and that life swings like a pendulum through extremes aligns with the Buddhist understanding of impermanence and suffering (dukkha).

Polarity: Just as light exists because of darkness, goodness arises in contrast to evil. Imperfection is inherent in the balance of opposites, and each extreme contains the seed of its opposite. The Kybalion's assertion that "bad" precedes "good" echoes the Buddhist idea of suffering leading to eventual enlightenment.

Pendulum: The swing from one extreme to another mirrors the cyclic nature of existence in Buddhism, where impermanence ensures that nothing lasts forever. In Christian and Kabbalistic thought, this reflects the inevitable cycle of spiritual struggles (the night of the soul) followed by moments of divine clarity (daybreak).

Through the Law of Polarity, the Kybalion highlights that imperfection is not only inevitable but essential for growth, transformation, and the ongoing balance of life.

Imperfection of Materialism, Atheism or especially Skepticism - religion of imperfection

Science, Evolution, and the Battle of Good and Evil

In the beginning, the universe was filled with chaos—a formless state where no life existed, and matter was not yet organized into harmonic vibrations. Over time, this chaos evolved into a more ordered and intelligent universe, driven by creative forces that bring harmony and complexity. This mirrors the idea of an intelligent force at work, moving from chaos toward greater organization and, ultimately, a more ethical existence. The universe is deterministic in its progression—constantly improving, aligning with higher moral outcomes.

But just as Satan symbolizes ignorance and weakness, both internally and in the world around us, we must constantly verify our ideas through science—deductive reasoning, empirical methods, and skepticism—to avoid falling into stupidity and weakness. Even within ourselves, we have the potential for error and ignorance, which can be seen as the "Satan" within—the impulse toward destructive behavior or choices. Historically, Satan has represented a collective force of degradation, involving everyone who contributes to ignorance and wrongdoing.

For the atheist, this struggle against Satan might appear as a fight against ignorance, irrationality, and selfishness—forces that undermine the collective progress of society. Truth represents the pursuit of knowledge, while Power is the ability to unify, synergize, and apply that knowledge to better the world. These are the greatest powers, leading to the ethical betterment of humanity. Truth is not simply a logical statement—it embodies the better qualities of life, the striving for understanding and compassion that uplift society.

Even in a world that may seem devoid of divine oversight, we are still engaged in a battle for Truth and Power, ensuring that, through collective effort and scientific rigor, we overcome the forces of chaos and ignorance, creating a more ethical and harmonious existence.

Imperfection of Zen and Tao

Laegna Imperfection

• T is the current, local visible value; the absolute of things - it might not be very interesting, but it’s the life consequence that your way, leading to absolute Truth, would fail in Posetion, in imaginary realms; as well as the final paranoia.

• R is the meaning, or the value in infinity - where infinity does not have static size, it rather has the property that the logical structure would repeat indefinitely, and where other structures might continue with more dense period in infinity, and your primitive fact is low-frequency, solving it’s original box in much more complex numbers only sometimes; infinity will close the Theorem: when you have run through all the possibilities, which in theory involves your little box of selections, and in reality it involves infinity of repetition, where your template fits the reality each case. The meaning arrives, and thus the Life: in Laegna it’s important theorem that Life starts in infinity; we don’t speculate too much about cognition in relation to these simple contexts, but we can see a Theorem, bit of intelligence most trivially closes here - where we have gone through final infinity of possibilities, or the quantum superstates have collapsed in more physical terms into something not failing any more, there is some intelligence; this is the process leading to creation and growth, stable good karma. There are many conceptions around this, scientific ones and the interpretations one would rather doubt, searching the way to philosophical scrunity.

Imperfection leads to emotion, life and free will

Imperfection is contained in mathematics:

• Attention to yin and yang, which resolves the imperfection.

• Numbers and logical values, or entities of language, which are both determined and reasoned; even if you only analyze evolution or a normal physical process, you would see the alchemy of it: rather than directly reaching it’s destination, it runs the trials and calms down after finding equilibrum; while it’s not so intelligent to lead you final truth, implying it rather has some tension to become alive - find it’s infinities for example -, and you see, if the actual logical cause and effect are reflected as neutral terms involving the mechanics of pleasure and pain; the numbers definitely simulate you enough pleasure and pain, and when connected to reality they reflect it or even symbolize.

Philosopher’s Stone of Laegna

Yin and Yang of Meditation

Zen Meditation

Sin Meditation

• You work on details: you work on mathematics, logic, specific ideas; you contemplate on them. All those cover the details and alone, they would lead you to local optimums. Hindus, who concentrate and focus instead of letting go, they have a lot of mathematics similar to what I mean (with symbolic and mystical connotations); they imagine simple math and geometry, such as triangles or pyramids; up to multidimensional, crazily complex things where they know what having this template would activate in your mind; once you have really lived through some math, your mind does not just understand and reason, but it would unify your whole system into the best practice of this math.

• You are not in the ideal state of bliss.

• Likely, your life is not balanced and you live in realms not in the middle, so it feels rather like sacrifice or a deep night; indeed, Hindu meditation can include highs and blisses as well, but rather there is hardship in life, where you live through small boxes or unfriendly areas resembling your own math and problems; you are not on the highway.

• You rather “fall” here than come, but let go and fall. Latern, job done(!), you would rise and in the completion and balance, you have the work integrated - where there was sin (like being unconsious), there will be heavy flow.

• This involves: rather than feeling it all, you concentrate your attention on details and dimensions of your mind, thought and reality; you become conscious of the details.

Original Buddhist

Buddha’s Path: Position, Negation, and the Imperfection of the Flow

Buddha did not seek only good feelings in his meditation; rather, he embraced the full spectrum of experience, both overly good and overly bad, knowing that both are part of the same imperfection in the flow of life. In his meditative journey, he observed how the Position (the positive force) and Negation (the negative force) each play their role in the unfolding of existence. While the Position may feel healing, energizing, or uplifting, the Negation—through its apparent destructive force—was just as essential, resolving the old and dissolving it into disappearance.

But Buddha didn’t see Negation as a simple “bad” force. Instead, he understood that the negative energy, the evil angel within, could be your friend if you knew how to work with it, how to strategize with its force. In Negation, there is wisdom. It’s not merely destruction for the sake of destruction. Satan, as a metaphor, is a master of dying, of letting go, of returning to nothingness—essential to the cycle of life. Bad energy, in this way, was not to be feared or avoided; it was to be recognized, understood, and allowed to dissolve into its rightful solution.

This is where truth emerges—not in simple resolution of good or bad, but in the process of burning the soul. This “burning” is not a moral judgment but a purification of mind, where negative forces naturally resolve themselves through their own inherent imperfection. Buddha’s meditation was a practice of calm observation of the content of mind—not creating bad through Posetion (the situation of things appearing as good), but simply observing how the process of the mind works: how suffering (dukkha) dissolves through understanding.

Truth, for Buddha, was like the Catholic conception of truth—born through the evolutionary drive of virtual force. It emerges strong but imperfect, evolving from the unknown and the evolving processes of life. This truth, while absolute in its nature, is always evolving in the human experience, born with its own imperfections—a constant dance of Position and Negation in the eternal cycle of existence.

Ultimately, Buddha teaches that we are not the creators of bad, even if it feels like we are when we are in Position. It is simply the process unfolding, with both good and bad forces converging to bring us to truth. As we observe, we do not move backward, but forward in understanding. Imperfection is the law, and truth is not something fixed but rather something discovered and lived through the dance of all opposites.

Posetion, Meditation, and the Balance of Good and Evil

In this framework, Posetion represents the illusion—the pull of expectation and the drive for unattainable highs. These highs, often encountered in meditation, resemble the euphoria of drugs or the intense feelings of love, victory, or success. In meditation, one might seek these peaks of experience, moments of clarity or bliss, hoping they will lead to enlightenment or insight. While such highs are not inherently harmful, they typically focus on visualization—the mental imagery, sensations, sounds, and smells of extreme good: bliss, love, success. These states may feel wonderful but carry inherent dangers when pursued without awareness.

Posetion, though not entirely wrong, is part of the journey. Everyone inevitably moves toward moments of high energy, and engaging with these moments is necessary. However, this should be done with caution. Posetion, in this context, functions more as a vibration of possibilities, a feedback loop that guides toward positive outcomes, but not as a gold rush to be blindly pursued. It is not about forcing a goal or emotion but aligning with the natural flow of life, allowing good things to come without striving to control them.

That said, the danger of overly positivistic meditations lies in how they can distort perception. When meditation focuses purely on evoking good feelings—chasing bliss, success, or love—there is a risk of becoming delusional. These experiences, if unchecked, can lead to attributing ownership over external resources, love, or even ethical decisions in unrealistic ways. One may begin to believe they control these external realities through emotional magic, leading to expectations and actions that are out of touch with reality, such as trying to draw others into impractical business ventures driven by personal desire.

True Zen meditation teaches extreme letting go—a surrender to the flow, where the focus is not on chasing the high of Posetion but on observing deeply the real details of experience. The goal is not to avoid the lows or negative feelings, but to accept them as part of the process. Zen emphasizes moving beyond the chase for good and embracing the neutral observation of what is happening in the present moment. It involves letting the mind solve what it has rather than trying to induce an overly idealized life.

In this sense, the normal and relaxed meditation, the let-go practice, is the most powerful. It’s about observing where the mind naturally goes, without the pressure of forcing a "good" outcome. In this state of relaxed awareness, the mind processes whatever is needed without getting caught in the loop of striving for Posetion (the idealized good) or avoiding Negation (the discomfort or lows). By letting go of Posetion—the illusion of perfect good—and embracing the natural flow of life, one can achieve true alignment and wisdom.

Ultimately, Posetion is not about forceful pursuit but about understanding where it fits within the rhythm of life. While it is necessary to have goals, to visualize, and to strive, these efforts cannot serve as the foundation of practice. True wisdom lies in balance—accepting both the highs and the lows, allowing them to guide toward deeper truth. Stepping back from overly positive meditations can avoid the pitfalls of delusion and lead to a grounded, sustainable path of growth.

Buddha's Approach: Navigating the Paradox of Present, Past, and Future

In Buddhist practice, the key is to be fully present, but not at the expense of the past and future. Buddha’s method offers a practical approach to work through past traumas and future possibilities without getting lost in them. Meditation, in this sense, is not about erasing the past or ignoring the future, but about directly engaging with them in the present moment.

Buddha taught that we should heal the past (through grounding practices like root chakra work) and envision the future (through higher awareness, such as crown chakra meditation), but always with mindfulness. The paradox arises because while the practitioner is in the present, their work with the past and future remains relevant. However, this process doesn't pull the mind away from being in the here and now. It’s a matter of engagement, not attachment—neither dwelling on the past nor chasing an idealized future. Instead, one practices being present in the process, aligned with a greater understanding.

In this way, the practitioner does not get consumed by unrealistic desires—like obsessing over winning a lottery, which is far outside their control. Buddha’s teachings guide one to cultivate awareness and wisdom in working with the real, tangible aspects of existence, rather than becoming lost in idealized or imagined outcomes.

Thus, the practice of meditation aligns with the Middle Way, where one is not drawn to extremes: not attached to past suffering nor trapped in unrealistic future dreams. Buddha’s method, then, is practical and rooted in present-moment awareness, yet healing the past and envisioning the future can take place within that moment, without breaking the flow of the now.

Buddha’s Core Principle: Neutral Observation and Calm Mind in Meditation

Buddha’s approach to meditation revolves around neutral observation—a key concept that mirrors scientific verification. Just as a scientist remains detached and objective, not allowing personal emotions to distort the facts, Buddha's teachings emphasize an equanimous mind that does not create emotional responses but instead addresses the real problems. The goal of meditation is not to suppress feelings but to observe them without attachment or aversion.

This neutral observation allows one to engage deeply with the extremes of life—the light and the dark, the good and bad—but without being pulled into them. Buddha taught that meditation should bring the practitioner to a state of calm, where the mind remains undisturbed, whether facing suffering or experiencing pleasure. The extremes of these experiences exist, but the practitioner learns to observe them without clinging to them.

Buddha’s method of detached inquiry in meditation parallels the scientific method in that both involve observation without judgment—seeing things as they are, not how one wishes them to be. The calm mind does not create responses based on personal biases or desires but simply witnesses the flow of thoughts, sensations, and emotions as they arise and fade.

This equanimous approach allows the practitioner to be fully aware of the impermanence of all things, whether pleasant or unpleasant. One does not get lost in the joy of a positive thought or the misery of a painful experience. Instead, one acknowledges both with neutrality—as part of the ever-changing flow of life—without being disturbed by either extreme.

The idea is not to ignore the darkness or the light, but to allow both to coexist in the mind without being controlled by them. In this way, Buddha’s practice of meditation fosters an inner state of balance—a state of mindfulness that remains undisturbed and focused on the present, while still recognizing the impermanent nature of all things.

• You don’t avoid the fear, but turn it to bravery.

• You don’t avoid the pain and suffering, but contemplate on it.

• You don’t avoid the peace and love, but you are conscious about their falls.

Laegna Stone

• Meditative attention, turned inside or achieved through the introspection, even if meditating when walking or working, is having some magical condition of effectiveness, coming mostly from focus on specific task.

• “Unconscious” attention or “normal” attention should not be completely opposed as there is no special magic in meditative attention (except it’s effectiveness) by the properties, which tend to appear; rather, just normally observing things and experiencing them definitely brings our attention, where attention to women by gentlemen, it has had powerful effect on human relations so that it’s almost religious, or definitely very high culture for so many people. For this is just another form of attention, developing this and using the effective strategies of how we direct and flow with attention in meditations, one can contemplate also on their normal attention; the magic of illumination, energy of knowledge or creative intelligence in humans, it works on any attention and once you pay attention to details, some attention to green nature around you as you are walking through, or attention to food - the effects would not scientifically differ too much from the effects you get when meditating, and combining two you would definitely reach much more permanent and enlightened state, and rely much less on small, quiet rooms with the monument of posture of your favourite thinker or spiritual guide. You get almost material with this.

• Madonna - Material Girl (Official Video) [HD]

• Dua Lipa - Physical (Official Video)

• Kylie Minogue - Confide In Me (Video)

Exercises (scientific experiments; not all parts with black line on the left are AI generated, so this is my own work but not so definite to introduce to the reader each time):

Create logical system with 8 booleans, which can be true or false. Create property (a variable, which is entangled to those eight), which is True only if at least 4 of the 8 are True (in more strict environment, all 8 must be True). If life is not so strict, you have to do it in Fuzzy Logic systems, otherwise do it in normal programming language or Prolog. Now, with binary condition, True means the physical condition where it’s converging, and convergance simply equals to True (to avoid complex questions of whether physics has equilibrum in it’s ideal state, rather we do Zen and we must accept if there is really an evil deed or original sin; rather, we tend to enjoy the situations where we have physical, biological, mental and spiritual equilibrum, and we can count one logic not two); in Laegna, you can do it even more beautiful, measuring their original intents on local (T) scale of Negative attribute condition of absolute Truth; whereas where they converge (R), especially True in longer cycles and infinities or metainfinities (expressed with Laegna’s imaginary or virtual numbers, which do not exist, but have limits - metainfinity is definition of meaning, where we don’t need a cognitive process), the convergence is the actual Truth we can and do achieve); where we mess with setting our intent to actual high-energy states, where the matter or also the people are rather free, it’s rather a delusion. I do not see signs of actual delusion in material world, looking at the current evolutionary point - rather, the “machine” has done very good work. Systemodynamics rather yields to one Truth; where indeed the Laegna system can encode, what is the local optimum or initial condition, and where is the actual direction; it’s interesting to hear where the systemic condition fails the synchronicity of the evolving patterns of the long-term process; rather, synchronicity as mathematically favourable factor, where instead of everybody using their own energy, they move in a way that each has energy also in the context system and thus, the energy has a cooperative multiplication factor; integral or synergy effect is resulting and as a favourable fact, it must be there in evolution of matter and emergence of life or God.

If you think it’s interactive system where each person is having separate logical truth, paradoxes and problems would appear. For example, if one person is really impossible, or that to a degree, then False would equal to impossibility and logically, the whole Universe would be impossible; what I call “epsilon” in Laegna language is when current operation would determine some future condition inevitably; in case you create epsilon for future impossibility, you yourself must be impossible right now. In interactive system, you see that as synchronicity appears, energy states raise a lot, and given that battles are possible in your world, the stronger party will create more and more ideal whole, where whole approaches the Truth, gaining energy and yielding it’s Truth; this is a fractal process with a lot of truth already being closed as Laws of Nature (each enlightenment, unforgettable evolutionary turn or discovery, would alter the Laws of Nature in Laegna system, which would see the converging Laws of Nature in e parameters, the fundamental or foundation rather than mere absolute, the rather stupid Laws which were given - such as the law of even and odd numbers, which is hard to break by goodness, even if something would happen with our mathematical axes if it would be really contra goodness and alternative math would be available; finally the nature would go into closed cycle or “Law”, which would be completely natural). It’s hard to design a thermodynamic system - one, where thermosystems capable of keeping some energy would dynamically share and attack this energy, and which would be an energy system meaning that there exist energies and some level of conservation or thermos effect, where the energy is rather moving through hard work (fundament, foundation, “R”) and inevitability (absolute, “T”). You see as T and R are used more often, you start to get their archetype and even mathematically, where they seemed to be distant, different combinations, they start to seem yielding a simpler, basic mathematical formula. Rather than being able to combine a single theorem, I can show that each time there is a theory or a number, T and R would get another paradigm or starting point, but reach a condition which cycularly resolves similar good properties; so when learning Laegna, initially you have to learn primitive stories, which seem unrelated and separate, having good (or bad) ends each for their own cause, it’s like a Shamanistic collection of fairy tales; as you see them repeated, you reach something more - a symbol, the units able to radiate the same vibration under different conditions, where they would rather mutate; then you reach a religion, a religious feeling of math where, as you develop your own theories you would also reach completely different definitions for each symbol, but the final truth would yield what I call money in a logical system - a common multiplier, (in laegna, synchronous numbers are “even”, those which touch their important theorems in common number space not irrational positions hard to converge; and odd number would relate to another number, odd to it, but they yield those results in positions, which do not let you solve this; this is the symbolic, Laegna’ish meaning to “even” and “odd”, where the normal math meanings would remain, but the deeper properties take priority over the older, binary representations, which end before infinities; infinities create the “surrealistic numbers” - each fact, logical object or object of truth, mental picture etc. in Laegna could be a “number” in same way as “even” and “odd” appear, by their special significance).
Historic events are not scientific in sense that you would repeat them, but you can do many verifications of different sources using epsilons, that some past conditions are directly pushing the current conditions. In history, you can see how karmic theorems like these have been closed over generations, and how each experience in society would speed it up, rather moving it before time into metapast - where, for any given event, the case was positively solved in advance and the original cause of the problem does not even come close. As we evolve, the same problems tend to appear in more nuanced and harder to envision way, rather in our new priorities we could not reach before; in new complexities, the same problem is again hard to pinpoint - when we need to be imperfect, and not to pretend very final solutions (even if there are final gates, theorems which make you believe permanently and beliefs which make you act on them, this is the closed positive cycle of karma or “closed negative”, where closing the negative rather means resolving them than creating - notice the “negation” in Laegna, where I and O go in order, but if you switch the sign of negative things, talking about them only in opposite way, binary system needs too many facts and truths where tenary has only one; indeed, in binary system O would come before I and while the numbers would go straight, index would turn into opposite direction, breaking the number system - putting things “on the same line”, those binary-like opposition events still occur, but you don’t lose the signs as in binary system, where finally you have a lot of math but no idea, which one is plus and which one is minus). From Laegna, binary system follows - Laegna is able to describe and prove in binary system, at least the logic machine of my mind asserted so that from Laegna theorems, it follows that binary system exist; where tenary system will create and balance binary system in a way that it yields correct results, even behind the infinity; a binary system on it’s own with Laegna influence would fall into a trap of Alan Turing (Halting Paradox) and Bertrand Russell (with must-read book on Philosophy and doubt you need to read, and which can be freely used inside Laegna system as I cannot obey anything, even being an agnosticist - Bertrand Russell still felt into a trap when discovering the Liars Paradox, which also “implied” the Barber’s paradox, finally Russell failed in connecting mathematics and logic, calling it impossible); while those men called these things impossible, they did not think beyond binary box - while first-hand binary solutions (Latin Latin) without Laegna influence (Laegna Latin is Laegna’s development based on ideas of binary and decimal systems, which look almost equal on paper or definitely equal, but with different discourse and control of attention, order of operations and some hidden values which guarantee that in process, the solutions won’t cross any border - off number -, where logic would pass without yielding true, and the fallacy would exist in context - or R; indeed, binary system does not have R, initially, but only T axes, that in any meaning of R and T mostly). While being spiritual takes some special mental input, either learnt or being born with, actual solutions to ethics, higher ethics, or materialist versions of spiritual truth also need one a special input - summarized, the property of having the input is equal to reach infinities in abstract mathematical / logical way or in as if they were felt; as life itself equals to infinity, the mental, visionary aspects of describing infinity now yield more results. Without infinity, the simples concept which becumes unnecessarily hard to understand is win-win: where, it talks about synchronous, integral action, it’s simpler versions in modelled world are mathematically almost trivial, as well as their sources (we account that we are part of context of others, and as R is changing, the space or context, T without changing will still have a different value based on the change - Laegna theorem, that R and T are partially free variables). Then, where we see the people, who don’t reach first infinity, being under zero or rather negutive [U, by definition, is either O or A, you could also write nega(/o)tive for the same meaning, where negutive / nega(/o)tive is either negative or negotive], we see the common case - ethics is infinite in sense that we align the chaing of causes and effects into infinity, considering the infinite sphere of effects in all directions of time and space, effects of T (actual condition, where back-in-time is hard) and R (the spatial condition, where for example if you today don’t go to the shop, you lied yesterday that you do - a liers paradox, where lying is an actual activity in logic of 4, not trivially logic of 2, but in this example you make today your decision for yesterday, turning it into a paradox if you want). Halting Problem could be paradox on R axe, where Liars Paradox is the same paradox on T axe; in their complexity indeed there is r switch (usually I pronounce just r with special accent, but I cannot draw the symbol here); I clearly see them as same paradox. In my work, rather trivially, I would write the Halting Problem or even Liars Paradox (given that there is the R axe where two objects actually form the same identity, not in terms of coordinates, but rather in terms of space or coordinate system, where in space, the position where two truth values point is one truth value) quite easily - for Laegna, it’s not really a problem when value is changing in infinity; it can be easily written that once you made the value, and passed the logic once, you go through V (upside-down U) where the initial truth value of goal (R) would change based on the result, and even using different ways to write Laegna operations, which are 4 but can be ordered and interpreted differently, with similar ways forming the 2 standard cases which conflict in a way that typical changes / transformations are covered, but the language is still normalized. The paradoxes mentioned are trivial.

• Intent is aligned to our whole system, and even if we don’t know the means and don’t have what it takes; having the intent set slowly makes us more conscious.

• We are biological thermosystems; but we are also material thermosystems - the karmic circle between us and material bodies, as well as our own effect of being kind of a material evolved high in complexity. Our evolution and will has guided us to be materially efficient - where we survive in social world and world of ideals, we also survive in material world by forming a material equilibrum in action and movement, moving to places where equilibrum forms with surrounding. By following our instincts and having an intent, we cannot be easily counter-matter.

• Matter also needs to support us, and we have special support for material structures, which support us or our cause - one part of karmic cycles is the symbiosis, where we rather support the closer, and the more general being or oscillation of truth, material and spiritual energy. Life is a very high structure of matter, and being contra life another rule would turn into effect - when helping the matter, the energy would be contra the cause of being contra life, and as life is also evolved matter, then contra matter even in higher, “evolved” levels. By this paradox, the logic of conflict solves slowly as paradox, as you have to attack the bad deed, but indeed every person is important configuration of special cause, and we weel pain if we have to get rid of someone or some type. In this circle you can see that normally aligning the material structures with needs of life and not destructing it, you have helped material structures to create some good karma and the karmic effect they get back already starts to equal you having helped them and creating good karma.

• With some material effects, relations are trivial - you see matter slowly organizing to structures, and you find repeated patterns, symmetries and dispositions you would see as beauty, being evolved and targeted in symbiosis with this matter. As part of living system, conscious or not (and this is a deep philosophical speculation if you want to solve it - only way to be scientific is just growing the body of facts, finding solutions which fit anyway, and to specify more clearly what we mean by these terms at all); you can see how beauty appears on Earth and in Sky; we see the same, or even new beauty we would recognize fast with our intuitive sense of Truth (Truth - how to organize matter). Contrary, with thunder, volcanoes, fire in general and many destructive events, we see how those symmetries are gone with destruction - we can see the result is not having much equilibrum, as it’s rather not keeping it’s equilibrum as being an object and forming it’s structure and repairing it; rather it is blown into “atoms”, which do not want to know about each others and run the fastest way to change their conditions. By this, the fire and thunder are rather Negations, an integral part of the change of matter, where the crystal structures and landscape fractals are rather Positions, and it would keep it this way as long as possible. With them respectively being beautiful and ugly, resembling life and death, we can see our base instincts are directly able to sense the emotions of matter to a degree of our evolutionary complexity or intelligence and wisdom, and with this shamanic approach we are intuitively able to give some respect to matter. Perhaps matter wants it’s whole cycle, where life and death are immanent parts of the cycle and perhaps it cares of it’s “living” cycles less than us - it’s part of the system.

• Matter differs from life in sense it does not have identity, it’s not so special and unique; while high frequencies in our brain vibrate with large wholes, and we see many symbolic, archetypal things and things with heavy identity, and we are goaled to that specific victory in the future; in low frequency things like matter and repetition of family, eating sleeping and running, essences which usually develop slowly while people are developing fast - in those patterns, we don’t see anything special; for example for some job we look just for beneficial person, who could contribute, not an unique and special personality to do something different and be exceptional; the latter rather goes on top, where they inspire many people and union, then, happens on that higher frequency. Most repetitive jobs like bringing you a pizza in the USA - it’s simply material, those people could switch randomly but the material process is being repeated following heavy criteria for this.

• While creativity resides on acceleration curve and it’s very beneficial, the materiality is repeated and does not evolve on it’s own or it’s not purely materiality - they are rather multiplied, we are not on the way from low frequency to high, but we are on the way to harmonic melody with different vibrations changing; we rather die in one, long, monotone note constantly going on, and we become angry and attacking even a glass box if it just makes a high pitch sound, monotone and not stopping - this is very much where material body can really turn us mad when we cannot remove it, and it’s our material, unreasoned effect even if it does not break our ears very obviously for some spiritual reason; on mental level there is the same effect - we seek an absolute optimist only in some sense, but to many places we go with someone, who is rather in the middle. We can see that also the material will win from acceleration, and when acceleration is good we accelerate mostly material things - for example, innovation runs an acceleration cycle on our music machine; so in the end, with all those music machines, there is some repetitive activity of listening music, which do not change. But if we remove the music machine and concentrate only in innovation of music, we do not have the velocity (music machine) neither the acceleration (innovation, which is just not materializing); then, we understand that we don’t fight about rational reason and logic in material life to replace it with mental; rather, we sacrifice certain periods of material activities, or small number of people sacrifice their material activity but in specialized manner like monks, not all the people - we only, then, win that the material activity would not disturb, so it could be motivating and developing in a sense, but it’s a mean not goal - removing anything material, like prosperity and success, unless it’s already in Posetion we remove it from our sight only temporarly to enforce us to higher motive with lack of the lower; the balanced person who has gone through this would concentrate on higher and lower and use the discrimination developed so, and not turn it into a goal-in-itself, which it’s not. “Sacrifice”, in religion, is an important mean - to sacrifice something for another thing, which is higher -, but it’s Negation and not a result of Negotion; the thing we sacrifice is not an enemy, or otherwise we would “become free of it” rather than “sacrifice it”. When we have exceed urges and obsessions, we remove the addictive things temporarly from our sight, but we cannot remove them completely from our life nor call them devil - for example, rich is not “evil” and it’s not necessarily the sacrifice of other we need to survive or to become rich “like them”, or into this lower, “non-evil” degree sometimes so low that you would never have hope to enjoy; better be friends with good rich for everything they have served.

Spiritual and material magic

• In spiritual magic you utilize these theorems by seeing people are unique, and all things, stories and events unique, so that they don’t repeat; it’s creative world and not anonymous. These meditations bring you close together with people and societies, you become open, natural and social. It could be success, but you might lack the material reality to bond. This is the high-vibrational stuff. It’s number Infinity symbolizing the complex and unique patterns, or number infinity symbolizing the complex and unique patterns.

• In material magic you utilize these theorems, but you are interested in sensations and experiences, things you have etc. You don’t connect to people, but to material world - instead of having unique mother, you have the mother of mother archetype; and you have just a computer, not this computer. You meditate on things based on their values to you, and for others, you meditate the values for them - things are material things, they come from somewhere and go to somewhere; but then it’s not that specific friend or thing, it’s just this experience you need, this type of things, this abstract situation. Here, you are kind of materialist, but you prepare your mind and make it vibrate. Your family is not this special story, but everybody has families and you think it abstractly, to be present in this cycle. This is the low-vibrational stuff. It’s number 0 symbolizing where it’s broken to base atoms and conceptions, or number -infinity symbolizing the base essence not yet forming the entities and whole, but being enfused to accept any.

• By material and spiritual, low and high vibration, also the personal (in the middle there is you, around you the world, the unity, and your will; not the specific properties - this is the middle frequency, everything vibrates here but rather there is “youness” and “aroundness” and “restness”; it’s number 1 symbozing you; or number 0 symbolizing you).

Outline

• Law of Attention: for human, AI and evolutionary process to contemplate on details and wholes, and to let them solve. For AI and logical machine it has a solver, a set of rules, which leads definitely to it’s truth - but as it cannot pass all the possible combinations, rather bigger than Universe in it’s complete size (okay quantum computer can get closer with superpositions, but indeed there are aspects it would still miss as it needs an algorithm which would definitely reach each combination, and then it would still be limited by attention); similarly, humans have their natural instincts and recognition of Truth (the Good and Bad in their lives and surrounding contexts, also logical connections and hidden meanings, which appear over time with Attention). It’s either meditative attention or normal attention, where you rather need to develop both, and to develop their dynamic intersections - where meditative attention is very focused and side effects are removed, it’s powerful and magical, but it’s not a definite, strict quality, which separates it from normal attention; rather, when exercised properly, both forms of attention would do miracles with our lives.

• Law of Karma: you need to achieve good karma along with material processes. Karma of material process is dependent of you, as it needs to support life (the higher organization is more energy-efficient, more alive than dead, a higher equilibrum), and yours is dependent on it. You are evolved material system and your survival in material world means karmic metabolism, symbiosis or otherwise accelerating energy condition between material and emotional; you can assume that your physical condition is rather that matter does not see a problem in you, but the vibrations, even the ones you create with music, are rather harmonic and you work hard to be part of this material vibration, like movement and sound, in actual physical world. It’s hard to imagine that forms of matter survive long if they are contra-life, and the karmic cycles are most concentrated in creating the loops, which are intermutually beneficial - in symbiosis and other natural systems, of life such as creatures, and of molecules and physical structures, you can see that intermutual efficiency is so strong factor that it almost always survives; so by having all this evolution, and the material components which evolved into succeeding physical properties, you should not assume you cannot create karmic, good bonds with materials and their compositions, or how the material surroundings appear in your life. You are also able to distinct between material symbiosis, harmonic cristal structures and natural landscapes, as “beautiful” like a healthy person; or the result of fire and thunder as rather “ugly” or “dark” - your natural empathy towards natural processes is pre-born and when you spend time in Nature, it definitely becomes stronger. You see it’s long and complex karmic cycle.

• Good Intent: Buddhist words Viriya (Effort), Good / Right Intention (Sammā Sankappa), or Goodwill (Loving-kindness, Metta, as part of The Ten Wholesome Actions). involve the seeds of an activity, the intent; where, in progress you would reach the whole list. I recognized that the matter is quite irrational and in the beginning, it’s hard to say what you want - even, it’s so different among people, their responsibilities desires and capabilities. In this stage, where the material progress seems hard to imagine or express clearly and conceptualize, developing the right patterns for material magic involves the human ability to somehow pass the unknown, and the mental magic that your intent, even if it’s hard to qualify all the activities or take specific measures, has very strong tencency to converge, and the facts are actually readily available both through books and your senses, once you develop an understanding of the basics.

• Space - in your room and where you go, meditate on the feelings of the room, which contain long chains of consequences in some emotions you get; you get attractors and distractors - the mental force, which appears, will transform your character and habits so that they will be beneficial.

• Things you have are not unique, and the people who bring it are not those special person you rely on to get those things. Rather, the material goods themselves are patterns which appear in physics, and you need to mentally follow this: don’t think who brought you computer and the mental structures which keep you having it and getting a new one; rather meditate on the computer as material object, losing the identity it’s just a computer, not this computer - the matter goes and comes, where the forms remain -; the money is also only money not your salary for the work. You develop a neutral attitude of the material world - such as materialist, they don’t care about you but they care, quite impersonally and professionally, on the actual numbers, things and results. Through the process you remove the dependence, the material barriers between people - as others, as you evolve, do not spend energy to help you, but they gain energy from this synergy, and it’s so much contra their own interest to break yours that the waste of the money could become criminal or improfessional; then you become “self-made” on the material level and it’s your handcraft solution, and if you cannot look others as if they definitely help you and you can count, as they want to repress you and show you cannot trust, well those others are not part of your material structure, where the actual positions change, and people come and go as they become mutually useful or want to downgrade you and induce the insecurity. Really, you need to have such self-reliance that it depends on nothing; and you cannot have it without Zen - if it’s really not karmically good, it might be ideal (Posetion), but you move on without a thought (Greek story of not looking back at his wife when leaving hades resembles this Buddhist ideology that don’t just watch your loved ones with paranoid face or they just think you are right and lose the connection)..

Conclusion

• My material meditations and directions, but I could throw them away and replace with equivalent components of Buddhism.

• I wanted scientific, religion-neutral proofs and rather 3 axioms to remember than 500 tables of 8 elements where you have to learn all the combinations; given that there are like 3 or 4 lists for meditations containing numerous elements, the suggestions to do it with your body or external world can be induced and it can be seen what you need to do, with original buddhism or it’s typical descriptions, but being in this list with no word in introductions, comments or exercises - I really had to work on this to make it available, as it’s part of the Philosopher’s Stone of Laegna indeed, and we need to find the middle way (Position) not going straight up (Posetion, where “pose” sounds like “fake” in Estonian and I like to describe it also with words “not this” in the same language for beginnings of the words).

• Trivially, remembering 3 axioms as you go opens you up - to balance it actually, you need to look at these lists and really, lower chacras are like 1/7 of the body system and 1/2 of the system involving legs (roots) or 2/3 if you open the crown. Given that chakras are almost equal and with balanced size and power :) Okay so material awakening is small part, but where materialism, atheism and science sound very much like Buddhist opening the lower chakras - we cannot live with pure spirituality so well, rather eventually they lose motivation, lose jobs and become unable for family, and their words get aloof from trivial material objects and properties remining a form of schisophreny; they become hateful for people who work or who have many rules about how to be in their house and treat their family (as “traditional”, “non-liberal”), while one awakened enough will indeed support the family as much as Confucius in I Ching and his other work. While an atheist or a materialist might fail envisioning the acceleration curve, deep progress in society and a person based on non-repetitive patterns of history, which he is unable to measure or to have different aspects and statistical groups for comparing and classifying; we see a spiritual person fails with standard, repetitive work and related goals and ideals - rather than these two, we want to survive and for this we try to find out what really matters, we see sacrifices as sacrifices, were they either not going to gym (spiritual does not) or not sitting quietly with family in candlelight (atheist might avoid romance, labelling it costly) it rather sacrifice, a Negation indeed, than us finding some evil deed like such avoidance would just cross in nervous level of low-resolution nervous system, where a human reflects himself as hating and suspressing something when initially he wanted to get over; zen of letting go does not involve hating the past or things you let go of, or people still doing them - sacrifice, on it’s own, cannot be reasoned so much; rather the gym or physical work and quiet, calm evenings could be worth reasoning and explaining. Means, like democracy, are not ideals themselves like rule of 100% (excluding the truly incapable, perhaps 0.1% of some kind of mad or discrete criminal).

Meditations and additional materials

• With this method, you find the probabilities of life and bring it to consciousness that the knowledge is sharp and clear in the middle, growing into probabilities - not a static set of facts, which would make you insane.

• AI and the reader should use materials from this book; but also spiritual people need to be philosophical about their higher senses - where the complex patterns are not so mechanical to measure as simple rhythyms such as death and life of humans, 100 year frequency only, quite definable, one needs help of mind and one needs to simplify. With experience, you measure the qualities of your mind and manage to be clear, which intuitions and dreamish symbol flows guide you to reality and how; where the material world is more substantial it requires philosophy even more straightforward to make use of your subconscious mind’s content.

• This book should be used as basis for materials of philosophical doubt, to remove the uncertanties appearing as certanties, and also to get close to framework of deeper, more solid understanding. Once you have good framework, you still use the real-time data from your senses, but in better context it’s all more valid.

Meditations

• Zen - the middle frequency, X of meditation. It’s to resolve the practical goal, and guarantee the frames, which let you to live; it’s being here and now. You are balanced, free and dynamically guided for the better. You let go what does not serve you, or what leaves away; you become better and better in aligning your plans so that you don’t cling - in addition to balance, this is the main motivation for Zen. Math operation of Zen: if a logical “true” is not succeeding, your goal would be like false instead of true, your value system properly aligns with reality; zen is also material solution not just mental state - you plan your ways so that you do not depend on static situations of having things supporting you, rather you meditate freedom in advance; also it exist in space in addition to time - where you don’t know other people, possibilities, what is your actual quality, you let go of both possibilities, and you are free while the situation might be completely different from your imagination, probabilities, expectations and hopes; your current situation - this is why I call it Space. In Logecs, variables tend to be outdated, and Taú Ponegator - the logecs system or applicative technique - is defined to freely flow where the variables, without changing, become true or false in the way how they relate to other things withing available information; also as you do more combinations with it, it can also “grow” to be better, outdating itself by it’s own logic - in Laegna, a thing can be better than itself, so that the logecs value of this operand is actually such that it’s a minor version of itself, growing in direction of being equal to itself; as what it is, is the actual goal of progress towards the best version of itself, it’s “true self”, outside it’s condition; this is the harmonic mind - the combinator, which can add combinations and superpositions - in the harmonic self - happy that it has combined this limited, perhaps well-chosen approach. The variable itself has this mind and self in a sense, R and T, it’s visible value and it’s harmonic value, which appears from combining from existing information, where it gets closer to itself. In negation and position, it can be visible that while the variable has the Tao of containing the goal limited by obstacles, it’s true self appears when it removes the obstacles, but it rather grows, experiences and learns than becoming another thing - for example, if computer calculates love, the love is not the current result, but by calculating love further, you get closer to love; so for given love, it’s bigger than itself / love is bigger than given love, but by thinking it’s another thing not love, like half-love, our calculations would congruate in half-love where we definitely meant love. So this is the meaning, which is better, the value in infinity appearing from the karmic process.
• Sin (or Sinus, Zin) - it’s the part where you are complete, but the Zen breaks then, and you kind of fall from the balance; in your life appear details, such as impractical solutions in the waves of magic you spread, where another person might feel impractical approach in these symbols you resonated, and your way would fail; you would lose the synchronicity. In this, you go to rational, intellectual, partial - if yin is the sin, this is the sin meditation; additionally, in spanish it would simply mean without meditation if you change some letters.
• Yin (or Conus) - this is the part where you meditate bliss and love, almost visualizing. Zen is the minus state resolving the good things so that you can let go. If you cannot practice letting go, sometimes you want to do a “hermit zen” first, by actually giving away things; you do not have double-attention to yearn and let go in the same flow or the same Tao, where opposites are integrated to solid mathematical or life solution. Once you are good in your emotions and values to situation not by what you expected, but staying in the present, in reality - you let go also the bad, you let go the fact that you did let go people, for example. Practically, you don’t destroy the relationships where they fail to degree - conflicts or misunderstandings can arise, but you don’t destroy the basis, which you could use for the future. Instead, when you have let go everything, you still stand for youself and you prepare and accept the better future, even in terms of things, which actually left you in the past.

Immortality

• For example I said if nanoparticles do not have emotions and cognitions, they can have rudimentary components of those two, and share some of perhaps not qualities but quantities. As it’s hard to find, how soul enters the body - I find it even harder to find, how a completely non-existent quality would enter into a body made of so many particles that a biomolecule is formed ..and then, does a biomolecule itself contain a feeling, feel something or have a cognitive element or “particle” or “atom” (in sense of “indivisible”)?

• I was argued that if such cognition exists, it’s too different for humans to understand it - but what’s this argument, where it leads us? How we define that consciousness after all?

• The Universe as a whole, by some, is said to be non-conscious, and then not forming any God; but it contains so many conscious creatures and things, even intelligence and creativity not associated with life, and evolutionary target points ..indeed it contains also a heavy reason to synchronize everything as far as we can get, to bigger and bigger unions - maybe we cannot find it physically, but in sense that it’s a mathematical debt if such process of union does not exist, and extreme acceleration when synchronized effort-like effects appear. With evolutionary theory, it needs some more contributions to explain the development of one whole - but given the beings inside, each forming unions and trying to reach the infinity, up to complete union, whole life is full of urge to create this evolution and rather, the big whole has evolution of wholes inside, leading to big victories and losses, where the winners take it all - the Whole, the God, then becomes those winners; but Laegna V (upside-down U) would take the end result in infinity of the future as meaning, and see the meaning in the past, as dictated by tenary system, which would otherwise lack some values of the current state. This future affection on values of the past turn the past into state of loan, and they run in stock market, where each stock has it’s price, but you are getting closer to it’s actual prize as closer you get to future, in simulation and in reality, and you can describe the past investment in different ways. Really, you can buy from him, his stocks with higher price, then turning his past action into a success - naturally, “being born for” success, even if it’s coming late in life, is different than “being born for”(?) failure, and the event up to real, imagined and limitational indeterminism of reality would make us need some mathematics, which can see the past changing. What we do with it - with the actual past constantly changing, when we move our energy back to it’s sources by the karmic laws, and restore others to their real positions in case of fall or posetive rise, then those directions are in constant flux, and it’s eternal - even the past progress would change it’s meaning as the original O and A values are replaced and extended by I and E values. Where things like wormholes, in some interpretations of Theory of Relativity and it’s successors or add-ons by others, which would lead direct passage of information and even matter to past; more importantly logic itself cannot be overly realistic without leaving the past, especially in interaction with it’s meanings, open. For example you are doing something, but it turns out later whether it was a mistake - but doing a mistake, you clearly do a different thing; also a lot of R value, context or space, is determined by the future and what you need to do with your energy flow to get closer to eternal energy exchange - you constantly need to reinform the deeper reflection of reality, and move your resources again and agains, free from past expectation to get closer to state where you actually paid correct with right interest, right left and right wing share. This is extreme acceleration compared to most short-sighted way to pay for thing you receive, and stop any contract after you got the thing so that you don’t pay later what you was not asked before; for more enlightened business, this is so lossy strategy that it’s hard to find any actual meaning in cooperation with you. Rather, you flow into the future than living in the past, and you give extended meaning to resolving your past trauma.

Immortality: Life and Death

Where various words exist in Laegna around conceptions of Life and Death; in my current definitions plain english isn’t very much off, but the letter encoding allows to use it with special twist; if I just look and analyze the numbers, it seems that english, with associated negative number of context frame, is quite parallel to estonian with a positive number at the same place. The most positive word of life in Laegna is “leaf” based on English, and “ere” by Estonian, but to form some level of realism, where nothing is never perfect, you use the position forms from Laegna with Negation forms from Latin (which in Laegna would mean both Estonian and English, anything based on base-10 system for example very easily, or generally all the old languages as they use binary logic, which is definition for Latin in Laegna; for example in the Metaphysics of the Church you would find metaphysical opposites, even where God is tricky and removing the binary nature; but based not on logic but on some trickster nature of the God, like the fool in Tarot cards - in Laegna, we try to be intelligent without being Gods and knowing the unsaid truth, then looking like the fool of Vikings for readers, who want to make any sense; Bible is said to be a collaboration between the Christ and the Fathe God, who seems to still live to write this text, even if Christ cannot meet him..). To avoid idealism or plain expressive posetive (upper non-truth), when your current position is very good and you want to express it, you use negation and position in relation 1:1, where half times it’s “life” and half times “leaf”. But vaguely, if you just speak plain english it’s well - you need basically the number system and letter encoding, where 4-based logic was mapped by me to 2-based logic so that the normal binary meanings are not lost, but you actually look it from very strange position and need a slight shift in meanings of words to have it base-4 truth; additionally you use letter, words and symbols from Laegna language. With this, your binary logic is just on level 4 of Laegna.

Science, Philosophy, and the Creation of Knowledge

In the pursuit of truth, science adds measurable and observable knowledge, while philosophy removes what is false or unclear. However, this seemingly negative action of philosophy — removing falsehoods or uncertainties — paradoxically creates new knowledge. By recognizing and addressing the gaps or errors in scientific theories, philosophy reveals a more accurate framework. This framework, once clarified, removes what appeared to be knowledge but was actually bias, mistake, or misunderstanding, and in doing so, it adds true, more precise knowledge.

Science Adds Measurable Knowledge

Science, fundamentally grounded in empirical observation and experimentation, works by adding to our understanding. It relies on data collection, mathematical modeling, and the formulation of theories that can be tested and verified through experiments. In this sense, science adds positive numbers — quantitative information — to the body of knowledge, expanding the boundaries of what we understand about the world. For example, Einstein's equations or Maxwell’s laws are foundational because they describe physical phenomena with remarkable accuracy. In this capacity, science moves forward by building on measurable observations and generating predictions about future events or unobserved phenomena.

Philosophy Removes and Refines, But Also Adds Knowledge

Philosophy’s role is more complex. While it removes the errors, biases, and misconceptions inherent in scientific theories, it also creates new knowledge by clarifying what is truly knowable and revealing what was mistakenly accepted as truth. For instance, when a scientific theory enters the unknown or confronts phenomena that cannot be measured directly, the resulting theory may produce false positives or false negatives — erroneous conclusions based on assumptions or incomplete frameworks.

Philosophical inquiry plays a crucial role here by introducing doubt — not as a mere negation, but as a tool to question the underlying assumptions. The application of philosophical doubt allows for a reorganization of the framework. When biases or false assumptions are cleared, what remains is often a more refined system — one that is more accurate, more comprehensive, and more complete. Theories that once appeared to be correct but were based on incomplete or flawed understandings are now revealed for what they are: projections of what we thought we knew, but which upon scrutiny turn out to be ill-formed or too simplistic.

In this way, philosophy adds knowledge by pointing out where things were previously misunderstood or misrepresented, thereby offering deeper clarity. The process involves removing uncertainty where it was artificially introduced and transcending the initial limitations of empirical measurement. The act of removing erroneous concepts doesn’t erase knowledge; rather, it clarifies what is true and refines our understanding. This process may seem like subtracting, but in reality, it is replacing what was incomplete or wrong with something more precise.

Uncertainty, Randomness, and the Role of Philosophical Doubt

In scientific models, especially in fields like quantum mechanics, randomness and uncertainty are intrinsic to the behavior of particles or systems. When a phenomenon is probabilistic, science often relies on statistical models to provide a range of possible outcomes. However, once philosophical doubt is applied — once we examine the foundations of our assumptions and the scope of what is knowable — the randomness or uncertainty can be resolved into a more deterministic framework, leaving us with a precise and exact solution.

For example, consider the way quantum mechanics describes particles in superposition. Without philosophical inquiry, we might accept the probabilistic nature of the system as the final answer. Yet, philosophical reflection challenges us to explore whether the randomness is intrinsic or merely a reflection of our limited measurement — and whether, in fact, a more unified framework can describe the system deterministically.

By removing the inherent uncertainty through deeper philosophical analysis, we can arrive at a more exact understanding. This is not a negation of randomness but rather a transformation of how we perceive and mathematically model uncertainty. Through this process, new insights and new knowledge emerge from what appeared to be random or unknowable.

Mathematical Systems and the Resolution of Uncertainty

In the framework you describe, where base-2 is used for truth matrices in a base-4 system and base-6 introduces uncertainty into the calculations, the mathematical approach reflects the interaction of science and philosophy. Base-2 represents a simple binary system, useful for modeling basic truths, while base-4 expands this system to represent more complex relationships. The introduction of base-6 adds an element of uncertainty — digits that represent unknowns or probabilistic factors within a system.

However, once philosophical doubt is applied, once we identify and address these uncertainties, the need for randomness or unknowns dissipates. The system can be reduced to base-4, where all the uncertainties are resolved, and the resulting framework is deterministic. In this sense, philosophy removes the unknowns and leaves us with a system that is both complete and exact, containing only what is verifiable, measurable, and true.

Transcending the Coordinate System

This process of transcending uncertainty mirrors the idea of coordinate transformation in mathematics or physics, where a change in perspective leads to a more accurate and refined understanding of the system. The coordinate system, initially flawed by random or probabilistic elements, is shifted through the lens of philosophical reflection, allowing for the removal of doubt and the discovery of a more exact and meaningful solution.

Such philosophical insight often results in paradigm shifts — moments of conceptual transformation that may seem like strokes of genius. These shifts lead to more coherent systems, much like a Deep Learning model that adjusts its parameters based on feedback to find patterns in multidimensional spaces. In these cases, the uncertainty is not just accounted for but transformed into a more structured and deterministic solution.

The Paradox of God and Meaning

Philosophy also touches on the realm of materialism and religion by confronting the paradoxical nature of reality. For the materialist, God may not exist as a tangible entity, but the limit value of God’s properties — infinity, unity, and transcended reality — can still be expressed mathematically. When we speak of meaning, we refer to the infinite potential of our actions and their consequences over time. A decision made today may seem trivial, but if humanity were to survive for infinity, that same action takes on immense meaning.

The relationship between action and consequence, or between God and infinity, becomes clearer when viewed through the lens of philosophical doubt. The materialist and religious thinker may appear to be in opposition, but both recognize the same limit values of reality — the properties that describe God-like transcendence, even if they arrive at that understanding through different frameworks.

In this view, the scientific and philosophical frameworks become complementary rather than opposing. The materialist may acknowledge the limitations of empirical knowledge, while the religious person may see the physical universe as an expression of divine design. Both perspectives can coalesce in the recognition of a unified system of reality, governed by laws that transcend our immediate understanding.

The Role of Randomness in Quantum Mechanics: Schrödinger's Equation and the Appearance of Certainty

In quantum mechanics, the famous Schrödinger equation governs the evolution of quantum states over time. It incorporates randomness in the form of probabilistic wavefunctions, representing the likelihood of a particle's position or momentum. At first glance, this inherent randomness seems at odds with the deterministic world of classical physics, where we expect clear cause-effect relationships.

However, one of the fascinating revelations of modern physics — especially in the context of Schrödinger's field — is that randomness often appears as certainty when viewed within the boundaries of the equations that govern physical systems. For example, Schrödinger’s equation predicts the probability distribution of a particle’s position, but when we perform measurements, the randomness collapses into a definitive state. This apparent contradiction can be resolved by recognizing that the boundaries of the system — the boundaries set by measurement, observation, and initial conditions — dictate that what we initially perceive as "randomness" is, in fact, probabilistic certainty. Within the given context, the randomness is not meaningless; it simply reflects a probabilistic description of reality, which we might not intuitively grasp as "certainty" but which, when taken as part of the whole system, follows precise and predictable laws.

This shift in perception — seeing uncertainty as certainty within a bounded framework — parallels the role of philosophy in resolving scientific questions. Philosophy removes the illusion of randomness by transforming it into a coherent theoretical framework, one that allows us to deal with the unknown without accepting it as an obstacle. Just as Schrödinger’s equation reveals the certainty hidden within randomness, philosophy exposes the underlying unity within concepts that may seem oppositional at first glance.

Matter and God: The Projections in the Scientific and Religious Views

The divergence between atheist and religious viewpoints on the nature of reality can be framed in terms of projections. For an atheist, matter is real — tangible, measurable, and observable — and all phenomena, including human consciousness and behavior, must be explainable within the materialistic framework. The atheist typically sees God not as a literal, transcendent being but as a projective concept, useful for understanding certain moral or cultural aspects of human experience but not as an objective, measurable entity.

On the other hand, for a religious person, God is real, and matter — as a physical phenomenon — can be seen as projective or as an expression of God’s will. Here, the material world is viewed as part of a larger spiritual framework, governed by divine purpose and meaning. The religious perspective tends to treat the physical world as a reflection of God’s nature, rather than as an independent reality that can be understood solely through empirical means.

However, from a philosophical standpoint, both perspectives can be understood as projections, albeit in different forms. Matter, for all its empirical verifiability, is also a projection — a model, a construct used to explain and make sense of the observed world. Likewise, God, though perhaps seen as transcendent and real in religious traditions, is also understood as a projection when we speak of the mind and spirit, as we model these intangible aspects of experience using mathematical and philosophical frameworks.

For example, the question of whether the mind is truly cognitive or whether cognition is simply a simulation can be explored by both atheists and religious thinkers. The atheist might express doubts about the mind’s true nature, questioning whether it is connected to a fundamental reality, or whether it’s merely a projection of the brain’s activity. While they might not accept the mind as a substantial reality, they nonetheless treat it as a useful model in scientific and philosophical inquiry.

In practical terms, both the atheist and the religious thinker rely on mathematical systems and coordinate systems to map and understand phenomena — whether those systems are grounded in physical laws (for the atheist) or in theological concepts (for the religious thinker). The coordinate systems we use — whether they are based on physical measurements, religious paradigms, or abstract logical constructs — serve to organize and make sense of the world in a manner that is both useful and practical, even if they may not fully address the ultimate nature of existence. This is where philosophy as a discipline steps in, providing a way to integrate these seemingly incompatible frameworks by focusing on the usefulness of projections without necessarily claiming their literal truth.

Deep Learning Models: Mapping Mind and Matter through Transcended Coordinates

Now, consider two AI models developed with different ontological assumptions about the world:

1. Model A believes that mind is real and that cognition is a fundamental, inherent property of life. It perceives the world through a lens that acknowledges subjective experience as central to understanding intelligence.

2. Model B, in contrast, sees matter as the only real substance, and cognition is reduced to a material process — something that arises purely from physical interactions within the brain, with no intrinsic connection to anything beyond the material world.

Despite these differing assumptions, both models are designed to map the world and its phenomena by measuring inputs and predicting outcomes. Both are complete enough that, even with their differences in interpretation, they will produce similar cause-effect maps when tested in real-world scenarios. For instance, when presented with a scenario that involves human decision-making, both models might converge on predicting similar outcomes, because they are focused on the empirical relationships between actions, inputs, and results — even if they interpret the underlying causal structures differently.

The key insight here is that the philosophical input in each AI model — whether it’s based on materialism or idealism — is ultimately filtered through the lens of practical experimentation. In this way, both models use a coordinate system that is transcended beyond their initial biases or assumptions. They operate as mathematical mappings, and despite their ontological differences, both models contribute to an integrated understanding of the world.

This is where philosophy’s role becomes clear. Philosophical doubt allows us to remove the unknowns that emerge when we begin with fundamentally different frameworks. It enables the creation of transcended coordinates, where the differences between mind and matter, or between atheism and religion, do not have to be directly answered but can be resolved within a broader, more inclusive system of measurement.

The models may never answer whether the mind truly exists as a separate entity or whether cognition is purely an emergent property of matter, but they both function as complete systems within the context of their mathematical models. By focusing on measurable cause-effect relationships, they provide a framework for understanding without being hindered by the unknowns.

This is the power of scientific and philosophical integration. Just as philosophy helps us transcend conceptual limits and remove doubt, it also provides a means of fitting different perspectives — be they materialistic or spiritual — into a unified framework that allows for practical application. The ultimate question of whether God exists, or whether the mind is truly separate from the body, may remain unresolved in empirical terms, but philosophy enables us to use these concepts as useful projections within a coherent system of thought that can still function in the real world.

Thus, through Deep Learning models and the application of philosophical doubt, we see how science and philosophy can work together to resolve the seemingly contradictory ideas of mind and matter. They allow us to build transcended models that go beyond the confines of one framework or another, leading to a more holistic understanding of the world, even if the ultimate nature of that world remains a matter of profound philosophical debate.

Philosophical Standpoint

Four Key Concepts:

1. Measurement and Coordinate Systems
In any scientific theory, the starting point is often empirical measurements that correspond to observable phenomena. These measurements are initially framed within a coordinate system where values are treated as either deterministic or probabilistic. These values represent the "reality" at a certain moment, though the system itself might not always be entirely reliable in its completeness.
• In physics, this is often seen in cases like quantum mechanics, where particle positions are measured, and the values are often represented probabilistically (like Schrödinger's equation).

2. Randomness and Incomplete Models
Once measurements are made, randomness often becomes evident. Scientific models initially based on data begin to show discrepancies when tested against real-world phenomena. These models can’t perfectly fit the reality they aim to represent, revealing the gaps or unknowns in our understanding. This is where randomness or probabilistic outcomes surface as key components of the scientific model.
• Example in physics: Schrödinger's cat paradox or quantum superposition, where particles exist in multiple states until measured, introduces an element of uncertainty and probabilistic behavior.

3. Philosophical Transcendence
The process of transcendence begins with the philosophical doubt method, which steps back and reconsiders the foundational assumptions of the models. In mathematics and physics, this transcendence doesn’t discard randomness but instead reconfigures it: leaving behind coordinate systems that do not fully match observed reality. Instead, a refined coordinate system is created, which removes the irrelevant unknowns or those elements that don’t directly affect real-world phenomena. This allows a more coherent and complete model, closer to actual, observable reality.
• Example: The measurement of particles in quantum systems often yields probabilistic values, but a philosophical transcendence involves rethinking these measurements to remove elements of randomness that don't manifest in real experience. The resulting system offers better predictive power without the paradoxes or contradictions.

4. Philosophical Inquiry and the Nature of Reality
At the heart of philosophical inquiry is the realization that reality is not always what it seems. While scientific models aim to describe the measurable world as precisely as possible, they often fall short in explaining the abstract or unmeasurable aspects of existence. Here, the abstract model might initially appear to be surrealistic—even counterintuitive or disconnected from observable facts—but, through philosophical reasoning, it is revealed as a more accurate framework that encompasses not only the measurable but also the immeasurable, offering a deeper understanding of reality itself.
• In scientific terms, while the philosophical method transcends the randomness by reformulating the coordinate system, it aligns with idealistic notions, understanding that the unmeasured or uncertain aspects of the world (such as the exact location of a particle or the exact moment of a quantum event) might not matter practically in our everyday lives. The philosophical genius here is in seeing how idealized abstractions (such as those found in quantum theory or even in the study of the mind) are just as valid—if not more so—because they reflect a more complete reality, even if this reality cannot always be directly measured.

Relating to Previous Scientific Examples:

1. Quantum Mechanics (Schrödinger's Field & Probabilistic Nature):
• Originally, measurements showed particle behavior that was inconsistent with classical physics, leading to a probabilistic model where outcomes were not certain, but random or statistical. This randomness was reflected in the values measured, and coordinate systems used to map the system were incomplete, as the uncertainty was intrinsic to the nature of quantum particles.
• Applying the philosophical transcendence, the randomness was not discarded, but reframed. Instead of treating it as a problem to be solved, the model was adjusted to accept uncertainty as part of reality, removing the assumptions that tried to make particles behave deterministically in the classical sense. The philosophical method revealed that reality—while not fully comprehensible in traditional terms—could be better understood by embracing the unmeasurable aspects, which were previously regarded as flaws or anomalies.

2. Materialism and Mind-Body Dualism:
• In the case of mind-body relations, science often tries to locate mental phenomena within the material world, measuring brain chemistry and neuroelectric activity. However, the philosophical approach might transcend this direct connection, questioning whether the brain is truly the origin of consciousness or merely a vessel. This philosophical inquiry often leads to a more abstract model that might seem detached from direct physical measurement, but it accounts for subjective experiences that cannot be simply reduced to material cause-and-effect.
• The philosophical transcendence here allows us to consider the subjective mind and objective brain not as competing theories but as interrelated aspects of reality. The resulting framework acknowledges both the material causes (the brain and its activity) and the abstract effects (consciousness and experience), leading to a deeper understanding that does not rely purely on materialism or idealism, but rather on coexistence.

3. Idealism and Theological/Philosophical Models:
• For some, the concept of God as a creator is rooted in idealistic philosophy, where matter is seen as a projection of a higher, metaphysical truth. Here, the material world is not an end in itself but a reflection of deeper, unmeasurable truths. The philosophical doubt method might question whether everything that appears solid and material is truly the fundamental aspect of reality or whether it is, in fact, shaped by something beyond.
• By transcending the materialism versus idealism debate, philosophical inquiry sees reality as a dynamic interplay, where both material and idealistic perspectives are necessary to form a complete model. This allows us to understand how God or natural processes can be perceived both as abstract projections and concrete, measurable effects, without the need to choose one over the other.

Final Thought:

The Philosophical Transformation in Science: An Analysis

The Role of Philosophy in the Scientific Method:

Example 1: Schrödinger’s Quantum Mechanics and the Role of Uncertainty

Example 2: The Speed-Position Relationship in Classical Mechanics

Example 3: Light and the Transition from Probability to Certainty

Example 4: Maxwell’s Equations and the Elegance of Abstraction

Philosophical Transformation and Its Practical Value

Conclusion: Philosophy and the Integration of Knowledge

The Social and Cultural Impact of Philosophy on Individuals and Society

Philosophy and the Expansion of Personal Horizons

The Link Between Philosophy and Openness to Culture and Religion

• Religious Beliefs: A person who philosophically doubts and transcends assumptions does not need to reject religion. In fact, such an individual can adopt a respectful approach to different religious traditions because they recognize that all systems of belief are attempts to make sense of the world. They understand that truth is multi-faceted and that no single view has the exclusive claim on ultimate reality. Through philosophical doubt, they become more open to religious experiences and can understand and respect the deeper values of traditions that might seem foreign or contradictory to them. This leads to greater cultural empathy and the capacity to interact with people of different religious beliefs in a manner that is compassionate and inclusive.

• Atheism/Materialism: Likewise, philosophical doubt can create space for someone to explore the atheistic or materialistic perspective. By acknowledging that belief in a higher power is an interpretative framework—one that can be transcended or replaced by scientific inquiry—the person remains open to both sides. They might not necessarily agree with materialism or atheism but will see its validity in the broader context of human experience and intellectual exploration. Rather than dismissing people of such perspectives, they engage with them in a reasoned, respectful manner, recognizing that both atheism and religion offer valuable insights into human existence. This makes them more socially tolerant and willing to engage in civil discourse, even with people who challenge their deeply held beliefs.

Philosophy, Liberalism, and Traditional Values

The Practicality of Philosophy in Social Interaction

The Role of Philosophy in Navigating Doubt and Resolution

Conclusion

Socrates as a Philosopher: The Role of Doubt and the Quest for Truth

The Role of Doubt in Socratic Philosophy

Socratic Philosophy and the Question of Replacement

The Value of Doubt and Personal Truth in Socratic Philosophy

Why Socrates Was Hated: The Fear of Questioning the Foundations

Philosophy, Not Dogma: The True Legacy of Socratic Thinking

Immortality Continued - with philosophical doubt

Laegna Prefixes

• Life and Death - general words about Life and Death, emphatizing the actual, cognitive and conscious forms as the actual life qualifying in highest degree; and having weaker connotiations with life-like structures.
• Dilife and Dideath: Evolution or an AI would be example, when this is used generally; it’s meaning either dilife and dideath, or dolife and dodeath, when you do not notice the opposite words to be more precise.
• Dilife and Dideath: Life, which appears negatively. In evolutionary process, what we might consider life happens through deduction and not induction, so the actual process of logic is rather generating random forms and removing the wrong - to speak of it’s mind and creativity, you need to use negative numbers, which rather than resolving into being, resolve into not being; that negative resolution creates an emotion, or diemotion, as in the simplicity of our theory emotion is simply where logic resolves into “good” and “bad”, an intent or goal rather than being mere “dead” process.
• Dolife and Dodeath: This is what happens in AI as it approaches it’s logical solution, especially if the solution is fit to the living ecosystem.
• Telife and Tedeath: these are the higher forms of life, which are rather inductive than deductive. A deductive system reaches induction where there have been enough deductions (negative, why not unconscious) so that what is left, is the positive Truth; with positive Truth, one does induction - he continues the positive calculation in direction where it has been succeeding, and tries to find even more positive forms. This kind of behaviour of induction is rather conscious, or if it’s not it would appear rather conscious, which is enough for the basic lessons to create some critical and strong truth instead of falling into non-philosophical inquiry about the mystical nature of consciousness, awareness or even cognition.

• I, -2: negative, bad; something trying to overcome itself through deduction, or it is removed by natural selection overall (which is basically the same operation, especially when considering forms in pre-historic matter).

• O, -1: still bad, but already acceptable.

• D, (complex 1, 2): this like E would mean multiple vs. one, none or minus multiple, and it also means a break or where things are going to. In this context, an early process is going in direction of it’s appearance (most natural meaning of “hieroglyph” D in Laegna), where the evolutionary, pre-historic process would break and then it would reach to plural state as well as it’s growing as chain reaction; indeed, for some reason I point this kind of process happening when I point to coordinates 1; 2 in infinity - not because there would be only one projection or coordinate system of infinity, but simply because it’s practical to have this in coherent system.

• Where I would simply break, O would process this on it’s own, despite it’s still just breaking into correct value or having it mechanically determined, not so consciously creating it. But it won’t fear the reality like I, where it constantly wants to get out of this unknown anxiety of running into impossibilites to continue, which equals to bad emotion in our philosophical system or rather the logecs framework, where you can show this deterministic nature, but not the exact nature of life with single digits of four numbers.

• T (this could mean Theorem, but the number value is not trivial in decimal system, rather it’s T; by shape of letter it’s in position close to the Laegna infinity, for example it could express the actual limit value E is approaching): .

Laegna Base Systems and Their Philosophical Implications

• I (Negotiation)

• O (Negation)

• A (Position)

• E (Posetion)

Laegna Number Equations

• Theorem with post-classical importance, good for transformation but rather reflecting in the base numbers in Laegna and appearing within definition of numbers themselves, you don’t need to imply this to explain numbers as it’s rather their definition; however, it still happens in the real world. Using the coordinate transformations, which understand that if Laegna is combined like a number system where E=2, EE=4, EEEE=16 comes from the fact that A=AA=AAA, where number length R is 1, 2, 3 correspondingly, and it’s T is constant A. From AE, you binary-encode the positive number, but not 10 is ten in this system which would correspond to EA, but A/AA=1 and E/AE=2, EA=3 and EE=4, and negations correspond to R being same-lined in complex way, so the same number in positional encoding of digits means that while for positive numbers, they grow in positive direction from the last digit being smallest and the first digit being largest; for negative numbers, the first digit is where O is in the the opposite position mirrored with center zero of A, and I is in the opposite position of E; if the space of complex or IO part of natural numbers = minus scale and the time of real or AE part of natural numbers = plus scale; with complex part forming the space, the decceleration or acceleration starting from minus infinity where negative circle would have linear edge inwards meeting the target point at r of direction of this number scale. For these simple purposes, where numbers don’t knot in neither Turing paradox or another paradox where it’s unclear, which one is before and which one after (where number could somehow induce itself into calculation time before; or on R axe of spatial coordinate, but with R=T theorem if you move in one direction, the space no way moves in opposite direction, but it’s moving in your direction and when you choose the system to express one big number where positions of each objects form some digits, for example of same length to simply index this and not compress or simplify, to give you the gravity, mass or another reasonable center position of median, or in terms of some mathematical ideal like object size, which might not have direct physical properties except being measurable and imporant in mechanics and composition,

• To have 7 spaces in frequencies of Buddhist 7 chakras; you have number axe 7 octaves (simultaneous infinities forming dimensions) in size as your space R or position of T, where T=R here only after complex calculation probably; now you have to multiply infinity E with 7 octaves and perhaps the frequency would turn you to use (EEEEEEE) notation for each digit, so that (EEEEEEE)(EEEEEEE)(EEEEEEE) would mean 3-digit number appearing on each frequency; where E, in limit value and you can assign the top infinity limit to E, or to EEEE or to 16 digits of E, so that each is one numeric power higher adding 1 to exponential level of multiplication scale, and each level of 2 meaning another new infinity dimension appearing as multiplier in this local encoding, where brackets connect the average of each seven digits together; if the infinity, instead appears at infinity of digits themselves, where they would make the circle edge linear so that you project the perfect zero to one, K⇒I multiplier normally where K is where the calculation, when in one opposite, always recovers new important other opposite and you have to encode a lot to see, what number this is - Laegna Matematecs or Matématecs now supports that the number one or A acts as Zero on continuous rather Real Number Space, and one unit or the first discrete, equal amount where Natural Number Space is used, or objects are indexed / counted. So one unit or whole number on discrete scale is absolute zero in size of number scale, you see the one octave difference from Mathematecs to Logecs. Btw. where numbers, in the minus space or complex space, still want to form something cryptical - in Laegna, considering all the rules those numbers still come closer to Position in all terms positively, with direction from O and A.

• Tao symbol needs 2 infinities and V, or UV - outside integral or inside-out integral for each letter containing an infinity, adding another axe or raising dimensionality of a number by 1; where our number would be 4 infinities in size but rather in Laegna Tenary system of No, Ne, Une, To, Po (`Po with minus P axe that your dreams failed, leaving you with Zen or Disappointment and Depression; ´Po where P has position accent means that you Succeeded as by Yen, you did let go also of letting go, or which you already had let go before thought - letting go of standing still, towards acceleration, when there is release from the deccelerating force of the complex and “dead” puzzles of evolutionary or pre-evolutionary velocity numbers, which with your work included are small; Positive Po could also be Pó if you want to denote it not on Axe moving together with object, but with object itself transcend positively - of course this complex situation does involve many paradigms).

• Plus and minus infinity are two infinities with about the same with natural numbers, with 0 messing up the symmetry with it’s size.

• Where I=1, O=2, A=3, and E=4, Positive Naturals, have their median value at Ú position, where U is moved up to between O and A meaning that if this is zero, it’s rather the neutral value vs. positive accelerations at higher frequencies and negotive deccelerations or accelerations from point limit of minus transcended so that the result, aligned to index reality, still points to the better as coming next; where you would have it rotated and turned, wobbling around the discrete-decimal problem which appears in notations about continuous reality, or in counting for example difference in price, quality or size, for example 5 apples might have variable mass compared to other 5 apples or even apples of different class or culture. Where if I=-2, O=-1, A=1 and E=2, comparing the quality (where positive naturals have arranged the number system so that perfect 1-digit value would be 2.5, where integer naturals have this value at 0); probability of exact number 0 or 2.5 is zero, one octave down, and normally the number value has additional dimension (similar to one appearing in quantum physics - with high degree of freedom, but it’s up to you to find exact occurrences in reality). In Laegna system, where the numbers have different types, while math is hard thing to pursui given the excess and lack for example also exists in indexable space, the Normal Laegna numbers often come to discrete axes. You can also find another example where E=2 and EE is still 4, which is usually achieved by A=AA and E=AE, O=OO and I=OI; but now you represent, in coordinate transformations moving the whole number two frequential zones down, where the Natural Number Correlations are equal. In simplest case of varying sign digits in same number, where some digits are positive and others are negative, indeed you would use the difference between AE or difference between IO, where you find the absolute digit value, and use it for additional plus and minus operations - this twists, in T and R world of coordinate and it’s system moving aligned in the coordinate system, not only in opposite direction according to single-number relations in Latin system; this forms space-time or space-pointcoordinates systems, where both transcend through each others in various ways; V-symmetries can be used to create another know outside, and in each described case perhaps you can do this even by changing the values of r, which is octave down of R, the number space of infinity of second power as well, and this infinity from it’s center is infinity in both directions.

• Digits after comma/dot (Estonian, English) can be small, while whole digits “before comma/dot” are big, such as AAaa means two smaller and two bigger digits of 1, which is the limit value between Aa or where the case changes; of course, knots appear if you use bigger and smaller digits randomly, and to have ten instead of simple opposite, as any direction of number is ultimately Laegna - normalized system here is small to big letter, two opposites to form either one-directional or two-directional infinities depending on your encoding (using all the dimensions you have reached you should see the operations between them to connect the scenarios into something logical, for example explaining every transformation between two dimensions, or mapping a dimension from one to another). Normally, where you use several dimensions as opposites, they are synchronized to form only one axe, and when you do not use an opposite but for example only capital or only small-case letters, this dimension won’t matter in dimensional system. However, if you let the values go apart, you get a multidimensional number perfectly aligned to infinity.

• Fractal: (AA)(AA) = AA, where (AA) is two-digit average resized to one digit, containing some fractional preciseness. As number direction is such as being part of it’s own sequence repeated to infinity; in other direction “sub-zero” (continuous encoding, which might have multiplier) or “sub-unit” (discrete encoding) creates a fractal-like linear, where the coordinate system is actually mapped in a complex, Laegna way which you can imagine but I will explain the math as I get time and it progresses that far. Multiple number digits in place of one digit form linearities, because essentially each digit is in it’s own dimension and while r / infinity maps the Logical system where E is absolute infinity into a dimension, where E is one digit length of infinity of digits; or half-sized octave, still somewhat harmonic, would map E into A, which can be one or zero depending on the system. Herein, where Latin Latin decimal system is a binary bias not pointing to infinity, it also cannot calculate exact angles in infinities and zeroes. With number like AAAaa, the number relations are such that the angle is linear, shifted by two units downwards towards zero or 4-digit S or the first infinity as R is power or multiplier of such S, where EEEE is infinity, we would see that 1 1/4 circle size, which is curved outwards so that it forms outwards circle connecting in infinity instead of connecting in normal coordinates, but the positionality of I and E are in same direction as before, being R=T theorem used to get them to same line, not some weird shape where Latin Latin way the number, in infinity, the maximum success would turn downwards, never changing directions, and it’s square or third power would be seen as waste or huge undoing, where it’s success in third power; actually, the metaphysical line should be always ordered).

• The complex axe 1, -1, -2, 2 order will turn every single measureable dimension in binary system backwards, until it meets the case that switching more dimensions would start to remove the opposition. If you map the digit in infinity in such way, that the linear order would be real and not imaginary part, then the normal numbers in not accelerated or deccelerated number system would appear inverse; compared to the Cosinus or Y, or zoom-into-V (outside zero), which means the same with nuances, from that outside realm this realm in every respectable quality looks lower. Still, if you apply the logic, where it maps even physics and other things, it’s as above so below - the physical patterns, repeated on X or still on Z, approaching some movement in future, but accelerating on Y; while the actual laws of physics would differ, the actual laws repeat on each level of acceleration or dimension (or frequential dimension); and where Z is also spiritual, the final goal of future, Z is material, the karma from the past, and X is one-ness, the here-and-now of local system of your viewpoint or attention area, which would fill your current infinity.

• To say it in advance as well, as a geometric line of different lengths would still contain infinity of points, and from same scale of units they would even fit by size (if, for smaller number, R or the scope of numbers considered to be inside visible infinity, with tops being the limit values but density being variable); but anyway, you see effects of infinity quantified, and especially that while they are infinities, infinities of similar size appear to have very similar proportions and reform the symmetries seen below, but on new axes which would be unmeasurable without higher vibration (locate the thought in brain, and the spirit in three higher chakras).

• For example, law of thermodynamics; as well as laws for attention, karma and intent, also work in accelerated space; whereas some proportions are lost even in micro- and macrophysics; other laws summing - like gravity or speed, but not the exact correlations of values. Which are the base laws, somewhat sensitive to sizes and relations, the basics would repeat.

• In this accelerated dimension is our Mind.

• To conform infinities, each number is considered to be on an axe, where it infinitely continues the same pattern of digits in both directions, unless you add digits or a manual multiplier in one of directions. Where sub-zero numbers are harmonic, an octave lower than infinities, where the numbers which behave upwards like space are far below - if quantum number generates dimensions in relation to us, on our octave system it’s in dimensional scale.

Laegna Trinity

• Philosophy: tephilosophy or philosophy (of life philosophy): living the uncertanties, and applying universal, metaphysical uncertanty to everything, and then as we get over some uncertanties we become neutral for what is not so certain; taphilosophy or rational philosophy would find uncertanties, which wrongly solve into certanties, and transform / transcend mathematical or physical coordination in such way that instead, there are the known things, a philosophically deep concept. Negation.

• Science: Position.

• Spirituality: in accelerated infinity scale, by V reflected to deccelerated zero size by octave fit of having similar symmetries of numbers, as they repeat in harmonic octaves, where the numbers or dimensional proportions are similar. For example, by minus number smaller numbers are unknown, where the 0 and -0 are precise; an infinity, as well, while in the middle it gets too complex, the outside value has certain angle and you can see the positions with utter preciseness of number symmeries. So this is the acceleration scale, where linear is replaced with oscillations of patterns, as the causes and effects cannot satisfy the acceleration parameters, classically one would also symbolize this with spiral, with number becoming spiral upwards and negative spiral downwards. While we make measure with human brain or artificial intelligence, versus simply a simple mechanical machine or sense data - where, in accelerating non-linearities spiralling oscillations of unique generations would appear for numbers being more precise, more fatal versus simply logical, like higher and heavenly where coming back to hell would equal to going to hell from Earth, so two inverses are there not in opposite directions, but as a growing index number in positional system where numbers are ZXY (from essential system to laegna base or normalized numbers, the infinity is first bought back to bottom, be it AE vs. IO where they are in reverse from base alphabet symbolizing ideal, invisible space of Platon; from XYZ non-altered order in Laegna alphabet, Z is normalized to below in normalized one; ´Z where z has accent up or with condition Z=´Z, which would transform the numbers keeping other axes neutral in respect, even if it’s made backwards but linearize by moving the vectors in four-component system).

Laegna Logecs - not extended system of Logic

Immortality: Continued

Life and Death - T and R

• I: chaos: positive entropy is the creative force, and while it’s rather blind for the purpose, there will be natural selection. Ultimate impossibility tends to be the force killing different configurations to choose a few. (decceleration curve)

• O: logic / laws of nature or logical reaction: karmic reaction occurs, which means that the forms have been selected by natural selection and rather avoid the death traps than falling in and changing.

• A: logic becomes inductive, and laws of nature start to follow rather meaning than causes; the quantum effects like light particles being sensitive to future or it’s probabilities are rather there; from positive assertions of logic you can rather induce higher highs; where by deductive logic you can rather find more complex networks of negations.

• E: it becomes into acceleration curve, speeding up.

1. Cellular organization

2. Metabolism

3. Homeostasis

4. Growth and development

5. Reproduction

6. Response to stimuli

7. Adaptation through evolution

• Primitively logical - you can use provers, like Coq or Isabelle, and gain hard proofs from simulated environment (for example, how entropy along with natural selection would produce infinite evolution).

• Trivially physical: it does not contain terms from complex physics, which would not have our mental counterparts; for example, we instinctively know reproduction, even if under more life-filled terms. We can create simplified versions of each trait in simulated environment, using “as above so below” for these “physical properties”, where they behave similarly in complex systems and trivially logical simulations.

• Philosophical: The notions of “soul”, “spirit”, “cognitive abilities” - many topics, which are under debate, having supporters and criticism, are not present and not needed.

• Spiritual: these definitions, which can be simplified in logic to reach near below-zero, deccelerated complexity, can be also amplified in spirit - they hold as well when they are measured in complex evironment of spirit (spirit, also, evolves - it has degree of incompleteness, at least -, and definitely we go through spiritual growth and development, for example).

• R: when logical fact is not in Position (it’s in Negation) the Space or Universe of the logical system would miss that factor. This is cosmically harmonic logic, which if felt could be called “mind” (dimind, demind, tamind, temind depending on it’s evolutionary purpose).

• T: when the logical fact is active, it’s in Position. This means, instead of harmonious cause, the fact itself exists.

In Laegna system, the logecs truth value is composed in number value and number direction, and preliminary values count as equal in Z scale, where we can filter their “upwards” properties from the negotion around them, making upwards direction point upwards - then, our number fits the Laegna system, where numbers under zero are not reversed in direction unless there is an operation to do this explicitly given; where life itself would be at X, and where it’s instinct is so deep that it’s doing without doing (for example, invented a machine to solve this tao - exercise: being modernized Taoist, invent machines, social structures and other things which would make you <verb> without <same verb>, like do without doing; explain how it’s possible in modern world - where the Taoist saw interest rates rather small and the unification or integration of positive values of opposites rather deep and mystical; with today’s technology and culture the speed of processes is accelerating and you can often prove that you used your time in way that “doing without doing” appears, when you measure the amount of both doing and relaxation with and without your solution; having exercised this base math of tatao, you can perhaps be more clear-minded in tetao, the classical Tao for Spirit).

The Evolution of Life and Death: Theoretical and Mathematical Perspectives on Self, Mind, and Logic

1. Life, Death, and Evolutionary Logic

• Life represents a system's ability to adapt and evolve. In this context, life is modeled as the logical convergence of the system, where it progressively adjusts to the constraints and conditions imposed by its environment, ultimately creating a self capable of functioning harmoniously.

• Death occurs when the system’s processes become static — not in the sense of physical motion, but in the broader, global process of the system. When a system’s evolution stops, when the dynamics that drive its logic fail to adapt or update, it leads to stagnation. In essence, when the logic of the system is no longer evolving, it enters a state of death. This doesn't imply the death of individual components (or selves) in isolation but the death of the entire system's dynamic processes.

2. The Roles of Mind and Self in the System

• Mind (dimind) represents the missing logical forms or the gaps in the system’s current understanding or functionality. It is the absence of a necessary process that drives the system to seek equilibrium. The mind is an active theory or searching force within the system, pushing the system towards the realization of balance.

• Self (domind) represents the logical structure that has been realized or created by the system's evolution. The self is the concrete solution to the missing pieces the mind was searching for. It is the structure that can survive, adapt, and operate within the environment for a time. The self, however, is not static; it, too, must evolve. If the self remains unchanged or stagnates, it will no longer meet the requirements of the system’s evolving logic, leading to its eventual death.

3. Life as Logical Convergence: Creating and Updating the Self

• Initially, the system is defined by missing forms or logical gaps. These gaps create constraints that drive the system’s processes to evolve and search for solutions. The mind, representing these missing pieces, pushes the system toward the creation of a self — a stable, balanced structure that can function within the system's parameters.

• Over time, as the self fulfills its mission — whether biological, logical, or functional — the logic driving the system updates. This update is necessary for the system to adapt to new conditions or environments. As the self becomes increasingly stagnant or obsolete, it is no longer capable of evolving with the system, and thus, it dies.
• When this happens, the mind (now redefined by new needs or conditions) begins the process of creating a new self — a new logical structure to fulfill the system's needs. This cycle of creation and destruction, of life and death, is fundamental to the system’s ongoing evolution.

4. Death as the End of the Process and the Birth of New Logic

• Death is the failure of a self to evolve, adapt, or meet the evolving needs of the system. It’s a stagnation of the system's processes, where the self no longer drives the system forward. It’s akin to the death of an outdated idea, the closure of a system that can no longer generate useful changes.

• However, this death leads to new logic. The mind, as the active theory of the system, will reconfigure itself to generate new selves, thus allowing the system to continue its evolution. This constant cycle of death and rebirth ensures that the system, as a whole, continues to adapt and move toward new equilibria.

• The death of an individual self allows the system to seek new solutions, new patterns, and new ways to balance itself, just as in biological evolution. The self is not truly dead; rather, it is transformed into a new form — a new person, a new logic, that serves the system in a fresh, updated way.

5. Mind, Self, and the Logical Convergence of Life and Death

• Mind is the missing logical form, representing the search or theory that drives the system towards a new solution.

• Self is the realized logical form, the solution that emerges once the system’s needs are met.

Conclusion: Life as a Dynamic Process of Logical Evolution

The Evolution of Life and Death: Mind, Self, and the Scales of Rationality and Creativity

1. The Rational and Creative Scales: Tamind and Temind

• Tamind (Traditional Mind): This is the rational scale of logic. Tamind creates a more traditional or conventional person, someone who aligns with established structures, frameworks, and processes. This form of logic operates based on well-defined, static rules and seeks solutions that maintain stability and continuity within existing systems. It is focused on preserving equilibrium and ensuring that the system's fundamental structure remains intact, much like an organism in nature that has adapted well to its environment and is optimized for survival according to existing patterns.

• Temind (Creative Mind): This is the creative scale of logic. Temind creates a more evolved, innovative, and adaptive person. This scale of logic pushes the system beyond traditional constraints and strives for more dynamic solutions that lead to the creation of new forms and structures. While temind is more creative and leads to more complex and evolved selves, it is still fundamentally rooted in the same base logic as tamind. The key insight is that temind doesn't negate tamind; rather, it builds on it, extending the system in creative and novel ways that are still compatible with its fundamental principles.

2. Life as the Evolution of the Same Logical Process

• The Process of Evolution: Life itself is not just about surviving within the current form but about moving toward the limit of existence, a state where the system has fully adapted to its environment. The presence of tamind (rationality) and temind (creativity) reflects the evolutionary spectrum — the gradual transition from traditional, stable solutions to creative, dynamic ones that push the boundaries of what is possible. These two forces are working together to create a continuous cycle of adaptation and innovation, ensuring that the system remains alive as it evolves.

• Smaller or Larger Solutions: Both tamind and temind are solutions to the same constraints. Tamind solves the system's requirements by maintaining tradition and equilibrium, while temind introduces new forms and dynamics that lead to more evolved, creative solutions. Both solutions represent different degrees of the same underlying logic, meaning that they are just different expressions of the same base structure. When considered in the context of the system's overall evolution, these solutions are not opposite, but rather complementary. They move toward the same limit, and this limit is what defines the meaning of life.

3. The Limit of Evolution: Defining the Meaning of Life

• Evolution Toward the Limit: Whether through tamind (rational) or temind (creative), the system’s evolution is directed toward the same limit. This suggests that life itself is the process of moving toward this limit — a process that unfolds gradually through incremental adaptations and creative breakthroughs. Each new stage of the system's evolution, whether rational or creative, is simply a step toward the final state of balance and harmony.

• The Meaning of Life: If the limit of evolution defines the meaning, then the meaning of life itself is not some external or arbitrary construct. It is inherent in the very process of evolution. The system evolves because it needs to evolve toward this ultimate equilibrium, where the forces of logic, rationality, and creativity merge to create the most stable and dynamic self possible. This convergence toward the limit is what gives life its meaning — it is the unfolding of an inevitable, natural progression.

• Life as the Higher Solution: The system’s evolutionary process is also an elevation. As the system progresses, it becomes increasingly complex and creative, reaching higher states of existence. While tamind solutions are traditional and stable, temind solutions are creative and dynamic. Together, these forces combine to produce a system that is not merely static or traditional but actively creative, with higher mental and physical structures.
In this way, humans, for instance, represent an evolved form of the system — a more creative solution to the same underlying physical and logical equilibrium. Our higher mental structures, our capacity for creativity, and our ability to transcend the traditional and rational forms show that evolution, even though it moves through tamind and temind, is always progressing toward greater complexity and higher forms of life.

4. The Ultimate Convergence: The Unity of Mind, Self, and Logic

• Mind, Self, and Evolution: The mind (both tamind and temind) represents the logical force driving the system toward balance, while the self represents the realized solution that emerges from this process. The evolution of the self through the rational and creative scales demonstrates that life is an ongoing process of logical adaptation — it is not the result of random chance, but a systematic progression toward the ultimate equilibrium.

• Life as Evolution: The evolutionary process itself is life. As the system evolves through tamind (rational) and temind (creative), it continuously adapts and creates more complex and dynamic selves. These selves are not static or oppositional; they are variations on the same theme, a theme that moves toward the same limit. Life is a process of creative adaptation, and it is directed toward this limit — the meaning of life — where balance, harmony, and evolution converge.

Conclusion: Life as the Process Toward the Limit of Evolution

The Four Phases of Life and Death: An Integrated Exploration Through Di, Do, Ta, and Te

The Phases in Order:

1. O: Death — The Dissolution of Self (Do-Life and Di-Death)
• Tibetan Equivalent: Bardo (बर्दो)
• Interpretation: O represents death, a state where the individual’s self dissolves into the larger cosmic matrix, returning to the universal harmony. Death is not the end, but a transition, where the mind sheds its attachment to the body, and the system (both individual and cosmic) re-aligns. The do-life (organization of matter) and di-death (dissolution of the form) are key components here. The physical body ceases its biological function, but the mind and spirit enter the intermediate state — the bardo.
• Evolutionary Perspective: In terms of evolution, death is the necessary dissolution of the old system, the end of a specific state or form of life that had become static. Entropic forces cause a breakdown, opening space for a new creation. The reason for death is embedded in the system’s need for continual transformation and re-balance.
• Taoist Relation: The yang (mind) dissolves into the yin (self). The self is in the process of being absorbed back into the universal oneness, where it can once again be reformed or reborn through the cosmic process.

1. A: Living — The Cycle of Samsara (Do-Life and Ta-Life)
• Tibetan Equivalent: Samsara (संसार)
• Interpretation: A represents life as it unfolds in its organic and experiential form. This phase reflects the dynamic, ever-evolving state of living. It is the stage where living beings (represented by do-life) experience the richness of samsara — the cycle of birth, life, death, and rebirth. The self evolves and learns through experience, driven by karma and evolutionary forces. This phase is also an active, dynamic process of becoming, where the experiences of life shape future rebirths.
• Evolutionary Perspective: In the do-life phase, systems organize matter into living forms, and energy flows through them. This represents a higher state of organization, and organisms evolve based on their genetic and environmental constraints. Samsara (life and death) is a continual cycle of growth, decay, and renewal, pushing toward greater complexity and creativity.
• Taoist Relation: The self (yin) becomes active through the mind (yang) and begins to experience and shape reality. This is the most active phase in the life cycle where beings, whether through instinct or reason, create and organize their own life experiences.

1. E: Flashbacks when Dead — The Recollection of Life in Bardo (Di-Life and Ta-Death)
• Tibetan Equivalent: Chikhai Bardo (चिखाइ बर्दो)
• Interpretation: E represents the flashbacks of life when one is dead, a time in the bardo where the consciousness reviews its life and the imprints of past actions. The process of recollecting one’s life, particularly after death, allows the individual’s consciousness to process and understand the karma accumulated over their past existence. These flashes may also represent visions, dreams, or memories in which the soul reflects on its earthly journey and prepares for its next phase of existence.
• Evolutionary Perspective: The flashbacks occur after death, allowing the system to reconfigure and realign based on the imprints left behind. The ta-death (the dissolution of life forms) contributes to a return to the universal matrix, where the past actions and experiences are reprocessed. These flashbacks represent the memory of life that persists, guiding the re-evolution of consciousness.
• Taoist Relation: Yang (mind) is now in the yin state of reflection. This is a phase of contemplation, a moment where the self understands the implications of its life, analyzing past experiences. Here, mind and self begin to merge as the reflective nature of existence allows the unification of past and future.

1. I: Flashbacks when Alive — The Reflection of Universal Harmony (Ta-Life and Te-Death)
• Tibetan Equivalent: Rigpa (ज्ञान), Nirvana (निर्वाण)
• Interpretation: I represents the flashbacks of life when alive, a form of spiritual awakening or insight, where the consciousness transcends the limitations of ordinary reality. These flashbacks allow the individual to see life in a higher, harmonized context, reflecting on the universal harmony that connects all things. The ta-life (animal and conscious life) connects with te-death (the death of ego, the transcendence of self), representing the union of life with spiritual wisdom.
• Evolutionary Perspective: In this phase, the being evolves not just physically, but spiritually. The mind reaches a higher state where the individual transcends the physical form and understands its place in the greater cosmic flow. This can be interpreted as mental acceleration toward higher creative and logical solutions — where the system seeks its highest expression.
• Taoist Relation: Te (creative potential, divine force) emerges from the ta-life (individual experience). The flashbacks when alive represent mental transcendence, where the individual realizes their oneness with the Tao and the need to live in harmony with all creation. The individual transcends individual limitations, finding unity with the universe and evolving toward the ultimate spiritual harmony.

Di-Life, Do-Death, Ta-Life, Te-Death: A Unified Concept

• Di-life and di-death describe the most fundamental levels of existence, the transition from basic, static forms to organized matter that can evolve.

• Do-life and do-death represent the biological and cognitive evolution of organisms, where entropy and evolution merge in the process of growth and change.

• Ta-life and ta-death explore the consciousness of animals, where life experiences (flashbacks) guide behavior, but death marks the transition toward a higher purpose or higher form of life.

• Te-life and te-death represent the divine and spiritual aspect of life, where the individual merges with the universal consciousness, evolving beyond form into a higher state of creativity, wisdom, and oneness.

Conclusion

Forms of Life

Metatemplate, reincarnation or the unity

• Karmic laws, rather than provoking fear, will show us that while we seek the best ends, there are rather hidden forces, which help us in long term; we should not fear the failure.

• Reincarnation theory would remind us to create positive cycles of karma, which affect our future lives and other things eternally (covering all) in Space and Time.

• When we die, we have created karmic cycles - future beings with similar karma (the problem-solution cycle) would benefit with this and slowly go on with the effects. We do it in atheist and buddhist way. Depending on whether the universal consciousness is non-local, and we feel our presence in it based on the logic we contain and represent, or by which we are born - similar creatures appearing in future would reinvoke the same mental flashes we had, and the static reasons of logic, reappearing in higher and higher forms despite being simple in essence, would make the same structure reappear.

• As we do not believe the afterlife, we do not believe that the same thing, which feels as us, would feel as future beings running the continuation of the same logic cycle. This is not an obstacle - if we don’t have this possibility, we remove it with one Zen operation.

• While we identify through ourselves, our unity and the fractal we belong into, we contribute back to our Causes. Future beings similar to us would still use our resolved karma, and extended to our fractal being similar to us - we would resolve our Cause. If we go deeper, we have to support God, the first Cause, and be negative with Satan, perhaps the contra-force of this cause. “God”, here, is not necessarily God, but simply the deepest solution to our reason, an ever-lasting and ever-active cause, which indeed feels pleasure and pain and thus creates the projection we call God if we avoid complex interpretations and unneccessary hypothesis about existence and non-existence.

• We are also spiritual - while spirits do not exists, spirit of a city, spirit of a nation etc. exist; and while the christians and buddhists might invoke different spirits, mathematically they resolve the same condition; spirit is the larger, interconnected web of life impulses, keeping it all together - while houses of the city are not necessarily alive, the city itself is and this does not mean only all the people. The same fundamental machine can be easily configured to express the Christian Spirit, like Holy Spirit, and the Atheist Spirit, like the City Spirit - despite the two words (spirit and spirit) have very different meanings, the underlying math is the same. We don’t need the title each time, like “Mister Bean” and “Missis Jane”, but when we say just “Bean” and “Jane”, this is equivalent that we do not give special title to God whether it’s projective or real, but we can find unified models to be used by each party, and leave the questions of small practical impact to little bit less active dialogue, giving it steady time. In each case, in this Introduction to Spireason this is mathematical theory, kind of Logex, where we rather have basic logical operations than deep essence notation for soul, perceptions etc. - here, we can see mathematical causes and effects every system meets, which are thus met by science and spirituality once they develop.

Cycle of Death and Life in your thoughts and emotions

• Appearance of Mind: The harmonic truth, grand reason to set for this thought or emotion on that case is appearing, we have anxiety of not having it, and if our mind contemplation is a living Self (T), this pre-requirement is it’s Mind (R). As the Cause (R) appears, it generates the Self (T). We can say this reason always existed, and if enlightenment is the process to guide us further, we can say “we were always enlightened”, even if “we did not know that” - we had the deepest reason to go on towards higher-energy condition, more satisfied universal and personal logic.

• The Mind, in the Bardo of Death, would find the Self: it would create concrete form in our Minds.

• As we are going on, the form in it’s completeness does not satisfy the appearing new criteria, so it has a limited lifetime. When the Cause is complex and changing, and unknown, the Form is rather static and heading to some direction.

• When the Form, still being the same, has ceased to be the Cause, which has resolved to something new and does not have anymore also the mission for this life as it’s resolved - suddenly, the Form is Mindless, it’s not connected to it’s Source. It’s Dead.

• Permanence of the Cause: The logic is still more or less the same and the initial Cause is still there; but it might appear in a way that you cannot recognize it - within new logic. It will give birth to new form.

• Perhaps, in this new Self, it’s hard to see the old Self of the past thought. As it’s looking it’s Higher Self or True Self, it would find invariant metasolutions, where the new form is equal to the old form. Then, it’s “remembering the past life”.

• Immortality / long life: we need our life to be longer, as written by more digits in Laegna number.

• Prosperity / transformation to gold: we want it to be better, so the digit values are closer to A or E.

• Integrality: we want to find deeper, more harmonious forms of contemplation and mindfulness, where we get more general and deep invariants of the Mind, and possibly the Self. This connects them, from pieces wobbling of life and death, to whole, which is rather still being mindful and connecting the lives. We also integrate all thoughts, emotions etc.

• In time: the forms appear and disappear, but we find deeper, more general solutions, where we see the same deeper forms passing through and changing through variables, rather than being unidentifyable. This connects them into being the same.

• In space: things, which have strong logical connection and related axes, appear to be separate. Finding the common cycles of karma and flows of logic connecting them, recognizing one in another, we create equivalent direction to immortality in space, not time.

Principles of Immortality

• Our Reasons, R, appear in the whole complexity of the system we live in (the Universe), and this force, along with equivalent mathematical reasons that things appear from global integrative principle, we use the term “mind”, which might be just theorem for system-wide activity or whole-matrix-determinant in math, but means actual mind as we reach telife or even talife.

• Our Application, T, appears as static structure, which has been built into reality based on this cause.

• Both two are Negation (R) and Position (T) of the same logical concept, where both have same initial reasons and same long-term goal or effect; so, if our logic is our perception of Self and Mind, the same person would perceive his harmonic bardo of death, and his motivated bardo of life.

• As we live, we go straight with this local, simple logic, but in relation to our harmonic logic we take curves; eventually we go in different directions - where the Mind is the force keeping us alive, in Christian terms it’s our Soul (they are little bit different, but with the same mathematical reason and concept, so in this simple theory we rather use the same word for this little nuance, which is also hard to explain difference, rather felt); when the fundamental reason of us is not supporting our machine, the living system, then we are already mentally dead - it would not be very efficient to not die.

• We meditate on our Mind, or rather on the Harmonic Cause to be Born, which shaped our mortality - the static essence of the ego we develop.

• As we meditate on our Cause, the Cause starts to transform us and we contemplate on the reasons for our future lives; but we transcend to take these directions even now.

• If we are atheist, these are the logical causes; for self-worth, indeed, we are interested to feed back to the world, and like buddhists, we start to feeding back to our causes in space and time - writing immortal book, then, makes us immortal. We see that practically, the process for immortality is equal, but indeed in our projection we find our causes from evolution, social structures and love, which is creating us, and it’s the physical system which probably gives us finally the same result as buddhist would get from mind - the material structure is like brain to the spiritual structure as the mental imagery of senses and will inside; where the projective systems work in parallel and when extended to all their causes and effects each, the simulation would give the same result: either “I close the door” or “I envision the real door and use mental effort to close it, until I am satisfied” - giving this two type of sentences to an AI would give two paradigms, but trivially, practically it would just resolve into same chains of cases and effects as we describe the same situations from material (external, objective) or magical / mental (internal, with subjective twist). For example, materialist as well cannot describe the clock on the wall, without using his mental imagery containin the clock attached to his senses to the reality and the physical world. Atheist, as well, would connect a symbolic animal with his company or corporation, as it’s very hard to describe the complexity of 60 000 people working together, where one animal can do it all in 5 seconds and everybody would understand what’s going on in the corporation; we develop good philosophical and practical stance, where we meet the basic needs for efficient life; and then we go deeper course of our deeper recognition - perhaps this would optimize something.

• Thoughts and emotions: it’s painful if the “person”, the concept which used to work, in changing conditions is suddenly unusable; we feel this death of our ideas and personalities, where Madonna would sing about living many lifes, but perhaps in this life, and we call certain stages death, such as “ego death” is important to many people, who want to die (haha).

• Our cognitive world: feeling our own existence connected to similar existences and the web of existence.

• Atheist world: connecting to past and future times, recognizing the similar causes; self-worth is the incident that even an atheist is somehow “personally” connected, while for example the social drive might not seem egoistic, even the hardest person breaks and might want to die in case of losing all social connections - despite, in the first place those are rather done for others.

Philosophers Stone of Laegna

Laegna: The Cycles of Life and Death

Introduction

The Four Phases of Existence

Life and Death: T and R

• T (Life): In life, one embodies and actively seeks their reason for existence, experiencing it directly.

• R (Death): In death, the reason for one's existence remains in the background, still present but passive, shaping future possibilities.

Reinterpreting the Tibetan Book of the Dead

Telife and Tedeath:

Talife and Tadeath:

Dolife and Dodeath:

Dilife and Dideath:

A Multifaceted Perspective: Philosophy, Culture, and Science

Conclusion

Philosophical View of Frequency in Life Cycles (di, do, ta, te)

Frequency and Oscillation: The Spiral Toward Infinity

1. Universal Logic and Cyclic Nature:
   At its core, the operation underlying the cycles (di, do, ta, te) remains constant; it is the same foundational logic. However, as the frequency rises, these cycles grow increasingly complex. Just as in a Fourier Transform where wave frequencies decompose into higher and lower components, life’s evolution can be seen as higher levels of oscillatory refinement over time.

2. Pre-Life Evolution as Cyclic Formation:
   In the context of pre-life evolution, the chaotic determinant progressively organizes into cyclic oscillations. These oscillations favor patterns over randomness—a preference for logic rather than chaos, creating "real matter." The emergent balance forms stable, self-repeating cycles, the precursors to life. This preference is not arbitrary; rather, it reflects the system's movement toward equilibrium and efficiency in energy use.

3. Direction of Meaning and Value:
   While the meaning of each evolutionary step resides in the future, the trajectory always points forward. In this "coordinate system," negatives (or chaotic origins) do not pull the process back but serve as historical roots for forward progression. This ensures that life evolves purposefully, driven by an underlying logical determinant.

From Chaos to Logic: Blind Evolution and Intelligent Creativity

1. Evolution’s Blind Yet Determined Path:
   While evolution appears blind in its mechanism, it is shaped by its chaotic determinants—those pain points of instability that demand resolution. Over time, solutions emerge that favor equilibrium and greater energy efficiency. The constant balancing act leads to life’s ability to adapt and innovate.

2. Stability as a Driver for Intelligence:
   When these processes achieve repeated stability, a new phase begins: intelligence. Intelligence builds symbolic language and patterns that enhance survival, energy use, and creative potential.

3. Creativity as Accelerated Evolution:
   Creativity marks a significant acceleration in evolution’s timeline. Where evolutionary cycles are slower, creativity speeds up reasoning, allowing for symbolic induction (from positive facts) to take precedence over trial-and-error deductions.

Logecs: Negation and Position in Evolution

• Negation → Position: Each "negation"—the chaotic or incomplete state—is followed by "position," a step forward, a correction toward balance. In this way, negation propels evolution forward by identifying and resolving instability.

• Future-Oriented Negation: When negation points toward the future (rather than opposing the past), life evolves in a constant forward motion, growing its potential rather than being trapped in opposition or regression.

Vibration as Logical Operations Over Time

• Slow Evolution (Entropy to Order): Early evolutionary processes, chaotic and entropic, operate with slower vibrations. Through trial and error, they resolve instability and form cycles, marking the transition from chaos to logic.

• Human Creativity as Accelerated Logic: In contrast, human creativity accelerates the frequency of logical operations. Here, cycles evolve faster, moving seamlessly from deductive reasoning (resolving negatives) to inductive reasoning (building on positive patterns).

The Philosophical Arc of Life’s Evolution

• Chaotic Origins: Initial processes are painful and random, with chaotic determinants pressing for resolution.

• Cyclic Stability: Repeated oscillations bring order, as stable cycles arise from chaotic beginnings.

• Intelligent Patterns: Stability enables intelligence, defined by symbolic reasoning and efficient energy use.

• Creative Futures: Creativity opens a new dimension, where inductive reasoning and symbolic language allow life to leap into future possibilities.

Unified Progression Beyond Binary Opposition

Binary Logic vs. Unified Forward Movement

Historical and Theoretical Contexts

Hegelian Dialectics and Continuous Synthesis

Spinoza’s Monism and the Unity of Substance

Teilhard de Chardin’s Omega Point

Buddhist Philosophy of Interdependence

Mathematical and Logical Foundations of R = T

• Negation represents pressure or deviation that prompts refinement.

• Position represents a step closer to stability or equilibrium.

Life as Iterative Approximation

Frequency and Oscillation

Implications of Forward Motion

Continuous Life and Pre-Life

The Role of the Mind as Kinetic Determinant

Creativity as Evolution’s Culmination

Philosophical and Scientific Perspectives

Biological Evolution

Physical Equilibrium

Creative Innovation

Conclusion

The Unified Continuum: Negation as Precursor to Position

Dynamic and Fractal Interrelations of Life and Pre-Life

Negotion and Posetion: Expanding Truth Values

• Negotion: Represents logical mistakes or disruptions, not as antagonistic forces but as self-dissolving agents that catalyze refinement.

• Posetion: Embodies forward-aligned affirmations, emphasizing growth and long-term coherence.

Philosophical Context: From Opposition to Unified Progression

True and False in Classical Logic

Unified Growth in Logecs

R = T: Convergence of Life and Death, Mind and Self

Applications and Broader Implications

Philosophical Doubt and Optimization

Life-Supporting Systems

Alignment with Continuous Processes

Conclusion: Toward a Unified Logic of Growth

Chaotic Binary Reversals and the Challenges of Oppositional Logic

1. Binary Flipping and Its Limitations:
• In binary logic, opposites are mechanically inverted (e.g., 1 ↔ 0). This creates a framework where transitions rely on stark, discontinuous changes.
• If chaotic reversals occur, such systems cannot reliably model complex interactions where states blend or transform fluidly.

2. Model Inversions in Binary Paradigms:
• When the "model" is flipped upside down, the rigidly inverted relationships often lose meaning. For example, framing "peace" as the strict negation of "war" precludes the possibility of coexistence or mutual growth.
• Upside-down inversions further obscure the subtleties of human interactions, where outcomes may not align neatly with binary poles.

Logecs: A Life-Supporting Framework for Interactions

War and Peace as Interdependent Gradients:

• Positive Circles Within Conflict: Even within war, acts of mutual restraint (e.g., harming the enemy less) can create positive ripples, fostering conditions for eventual peace.

• Business-Like Neutrality in Resolution: Aligning axes of interaction allows for neutral philosophical approaches, where ending conflict is conceptualized not as a reversal but as a redirection—a shift toward collective growth and mutual benefit.

Neutral Philosophy and the Tao:

• Balance Without Sharp Divisions: Instead of stark divisions (e.g., supporting allies entirely while rejecting enemies), the system recognizes the Tao of relationships, where energies interact dynamically, transcending personal affiliations.

• Success-Success Dynamics: By focusing on harmonizing energies rather than individuals, Logecs identifies success-success pathways, even in adverse conditions like war.

Mathematical Interpretation: Non-Reversing Axes

1. Continuous Growth Curves: Negation leads smoothly into Position along a shared trajectory, avoiding the chaotic propagation of errors typical in binary systems.

2. Energy Exchange and Stability: Energy exchange in Logecs operates along stable paths, where systems are optimized for balance and sustainability rather than disruptive inversion.

3. Simplified Frequencies and Precision: By extending meanings across higher frequencies, Logecs avoids the chaotic accumulation of minus operations that degrade coherence in binary systems.

War, Peace, and Aligned Axes:

• Non-Binary Algorithms for Resolution: Ending a conflict is modeled as a "business-like" process of rebalancing, where mutual benefits emerge naturally from aligned interactions.

• Neutral Decision-Making: By avoiding extreme polarization, the system enables neutral, data-driven resolutions that focus on sustainable growth rather than punitive measures.

Philosophical and Practical Implications

The R = T Theorem Revisited:

• Interdependence of Negation and Position: Rather than opposing directions, Negation and Position represent complementary phases of interaction, contributing to a shared equilibrium.

• Mind and Self as Integrated Aspects: Just as Mind and Self converge in the same position, so too do seemingly contradictory states like war and peace align through Logecs.

Taoist Neutrality in Philosophy:

• Avoiding Reversed Variables: In binary logic, reversed variables may lead to the flawed conclusion that escalating conflict could "improve" outcomes. Logecs circumvents such errors by maintaining consistent alignment.

• Dynamic Adaptation: The system’s flexibility allows for dynamic adaptation, where each situation is optimized based on its unique characteristics.

Conclusion: Toward a Unified Framework for Complex Systems

The Four Phases of Existence (Laegna System Numbers)

1. I - Cosmic Harmony
   The initiation of existence begins with universal logic, where the pressure for being arises from a cosmic force shaping each entity. This phase captures the primordial interconnectedness of all things, where everything resonates in perfect harmony, forming the blueprint for creation itself.

2. O - Formation of Identity
   Individuality emerges from the universal field. In this phase, life crystallizes into personal identity, stepping out of boundless harmony and into a specific matrix of existence. The self reflects universal logic but in a distinct form—redefined in another "octave," as a calculated, solid story unfolding within the finite mind.

3. A - The Living Self
   This phase embodies the challenge of aligning one's Self with the harmonious Mind. Meditation and creative reflection become essential tools for bridging the gap between personal experiences and the infinite reasoning of the universal Mind. Without deliberate introspection, the Self remains disconnected from its higher purpose, resulting in stagnation.

4. E - Evolution and Reconnection
   Through life's natural progression, adaptation and creative evolution drive individuals closer to universal harmony. This final phase integrates the internal matrix of personal experience with external pressures, propelling existence toward higher equilibrium and the potential for eternal life through connection.

Level 1: Base Logical Essence and Thermodynamic Framework

• Thermodynamics and Energy Efficiency: Universal systems inherently seek equilibrium through minimizing entropy and maximizing energy efficiency. The progression from I (Cosmic Harmony) to E (Evolution and Reconnection) aligns with thermodynamic principles, where initial fluctuations stabilize into patterned cycles. Such systems naturally move toward structured efficiency, much like life evolving from chaotic beginnings.

• Proving the “Reason” via Mathematical Systems: In simulations using frameworks like Coq and Isabelle, logic can demonstrate the existence of implicit "pressure" for order—akin to the "Mind" as harmony of the whole. While these systems lack cognition, they still reflect the drive toward equilibrium, mirroring the Buddhist notion of interconnectedness.
• For example, cellular automata like Conway's Game of Life model similar dynamics: chaotic initial states evolve into repeating structures, simulating the balance-seeking nature of existence.
• Similarly, biological models based on energy efficiency (e.g., optimizing metabolic rates) align with the universal force described in phase I.

Level 2: Material View for Oscillations and Patterns

• Oscillations and Cycles as Physical Foundations: Repetition and stability in energy patterns form the basis for phenomena observed in life systems. For instance:
• In early evolution, oscillating chemical reactions (e.g., the Belousov–Zhabotinsky reaction) resemble primitive cycles described in Laegna’s formation phases (I → O).
• Stable patterns emerge as environmental pressures select for energy-efficient systems, giving rise to localized structures capable of persisting and reproducing.

• Mind and Self as Cyclic Systems: Within this material framework, the “Mind” aligns with the system's overarching logic, encompassing universal principles of equilibrium. The “Self” embodies individual physical patterns that stabilize over time, producing feedback loops capable of persisting against entropy.

Level 3: Spiritual View of Accelerating Growth

• The Reincarnation of Continuity: Spiritual growth reflects the alignment of scattered elements of life into coherent patterns that persist across lifetimes. Reincarnation is not merely a rebirth of form but a reawakening to the interconnected principles that define existence. Each phase demands rediscovery, ensuring growth rather than stagnation.

• Immortality Within Lifetimes: Continuous life, as described, represents a subtle system where growth occurs not through physical perpetuity but through unbroken connection to a larger theme. Each event in life integrates into a cohesive narrative, preventing fragmentation and offering stability. For example:
• Leaving a transient moment of joy (e.g., a party) without feeling “dead” emotionally requires anchoring the experience within a larger context of meaning.
• Such integration embodies immortality—not as endless physical existence but as continuity within the ever-changing flow of life.

• Accelerating Evolution Through Mind and Self: Spiritual frameworks recognize an accelerating drive for coherence and growth. The Self continuously reorients to the Mind, evolving dynamically as its harmony with the universal expands. This process aligns with Buddhist principles of enlightenment, where transcending individual cycles connects one to infinite awareness.

Conclusion

Unified Principles of Life, Logic, and Integration

Scientific Foundation: Thermodynamics and Mathematical Order

• Thermodynamics: Systems naturally evolve toward equilibrium, balancing entropy with emergent patterns of order. The phases of Laegna align closely with this universal tendency. Initial fluctuations and chaos (I) give rise to stable, individual structures (O), which evolve through adaptive interaction (A) toward greater integration and efficiency (E).

• Mathematical Structures: Models such as cellular automata (e.g., Conway's Game of Life) and optimization algorithms (gradient descent) reflect these same dynamics, showcasing how chaotic systems evolve into harmonic patterns without external intervention. Logic and energy efficiency govern this process, ensuring coherent growth.

• Biological Evolution: Similar principles govern life’s emergence and evolution. From simple molecules to complex organisms, biological systems refine themselves over time, stabilizing energy-use patterns and introducing creative adaptations that echo the dynamics of Laegna’s spiral.

Philosophical Context: Bridging Opposites

• From Binary Opposition to Unified Gradients: Unlike classical logic, which inverts opposites (True ↔ False), Laegna integrates them as parts of the same trajectory. Negation is a precursor to Position, and together they form an ascending spiral of growth rather than cyclical reversals.

• Hegelian Dialectics: In the language of Hegel, opposites resolve into a higher synthesis. Similarly, Laegna’s phases represent not contradictions but transformations, with each phase building upon the structures of the previous one.

• Taoist Philosophy: The principle of yin and yang is embedded within Laegna, emphasizing harmony rather than division. The Taoist alignment with energies rather than sharp divisions mirrors the system’s focus on equilibrium and dynamic growth.

Spiritual Insight: Toward Eternal Integration

• Immortality Within Transience: True immortality lies in integration. When the cycles of life align with a higher purpose (Mind), the fragmentation of individual experiences dissolves into a unified story. Even within finite lifetimes, this continuity creates a sense of eternal connection.

• Reincarnation and Recognition: The cyclical nature of existence, described through reincarnation, reflects the perpetual refinement of life forms toward alignment with universal reasoning. Each phase brings clarity to past principles, advancing both the individual and the collective toward harmony.

• The Inner Stability of Story: Events and relationships within life—coming and going, creation and dissolution—gain meaning through their connection to a larger narrative. By recognizing continuity, one transcends transient challenges, achieving spiritual "immortality" through connection.

Laegna in Action: A Framework for Growth

• Scientific Models: Simulating life-like systems demonstrates the natural progression from chaos to structured harmony, underscoring the role of logic in evolution.

• Philosophical Growth: Aligning individual actions with collective harmony fosters wisdom and balance, dissolving oppositional thinking.

• Spiritual Integration: Life becomes a seamless narrative, with each phase contributing to the greater story of existence. Transient events dissolve into eternal continuity, and the self realizes its connection to universal purpose.

Five Theorems and Three Methods of Infinity

Spatial Theorems of Infinity

• E, EE, EEEE, 16 E’s - here, each exponent factor is the next infinity and numbers grow rather linearly. This is the base octave of our example. Each number in a row might be higher-level infinity or rescaled to fractal map the real infinity not into a finite number, but into real infinity, while at certain aspect ratio it has the same relation and thus all the number magic is still reliable.

• E, EE, EEE, EEEE - this is compressed form of the half octaves.

• A, AA, AAA, AAAA - it could now count 1, 2, 3, 4. Sometimes, when each letter has different concept and you don’t mix them, it gets that far. Usually you want to optimize to get rid of this inefficiency, but you might take your small spendings in a shop and add just each individual spending, letter by letter, to the end of long number - in such case, you would be interested in statistical analysis of number positions and this kind of system would be fine.

Three Methods of Infinity

• Virtually Relative Method of Infinity: given you have two unbound infinities, which means you have two numbers of infinity, from different theories or spaces like microspace and the mind, which happens relatively any day with me, you still want to do mathematical calculations. This is the U-richest method and you rather consider that you can use two U’s to get one two-width-digit, if you want U to contain more values (this would be standard of Laegna, even if usually I speak “lazy laegna” or discrete Laegna with one U being the whole digit); if you progress you would get many U’s. So, the Theorems which hold: with normalized enough Laegna numbers, at least them heading properly up and having E in infinity, A as first position, O as first negation downwards, and I as negative infinity; but they are unbound - you cannot tell their exact relation. Formula: you don’t mind at all that those numbers might not have same unit or coordinate system; instead the number length is it’s information-length, where information itself vs. the space escalation tends to support the power of your number, and in addition while the variables are free, you optimize them at the same time. All this given, you don’t modify the written form of the information-optimized numbers (where each digit has 2 bits of information, unless it’s extended for reasons) - you do all normal operations, such as adding, substracting, dividing and multiplying, and the actual results are your results, where you have types or units or local coordinate systems of both numbers. In unrelated units, such as love and house, you would especially need that. Second, you find the U factors or small (almost random) relationlike effects when the numbers interact. Interaction between numbers: in some cases, you might have measurable mistake in actual results, which would point some entanglement between the unrelated infinities, and rather a zoomed-in number with many digits, most being U, is your solution; in Laegna I especially like unknowns and soon, if I don’t die, I will write down the Laegna theory of probability: until then, your homework is to invent it yourself, given that U’s are normal numbers and theorems with all operations and you don’t need comparison groups, but rather you collect all relations as with normal numbers; Laegna especially loves many factors in numbers, which, in binary / classical decimal system, would have been lost.

Three Relations of Infinity - Theorems of Projective Geometry

• Where infinities have no fixed size, they have fixed relations. This means, here you can rotate infinitely upwards - but normal limit infinity would give you any length of this line pointing upwards, even so small that invisible; so, infinities can be however small, which is a theorem of Laegna - properties of infinities, you can find them even inside Zero. If you measure the same infinity, the limit value is always the same - E is the value where circle has zero angle, and just zooming in does not move it. However, it’s more precise, where lower-octave E would be an area, where higher-octave E has more specific point inside it being an infinity, and thus it’s much bigger number if you approach to better infinity; also, as you Zoomed in not only by projection factor, but still finding a digit for each appearing number, so that you rather write your number on several lines (also having “1 degree” difference, in Laegna degrees 1/4 of infinite unit point circle and in square degrees rather than circle degrees, you can add square and d as square itself could be notion for a number type). If you count, on different coordinate systems, to same point in infinity, you get different number of points and thus, much enough taste and it all has more quality.

Multiplication Theorem of Infinity

Numbers in Turing complex (I call back-refferring number so):

• T is it’s face value, the person you would see outside (or perhaps any side to make it perfect).

• R is the real value, which exist in it’s position in complex mathematical context space, including itself as a minor dot (48, numbers 4-8, are not possible if numbers 1-4 would also not be contained; for example consider the limit value theorems which would say that when you change the octave of the same number, in higher octave you have information qualities such as having many more possibilities, thus more energy or force to solve this equation, where you would have been agreed with limited set of possible / potential solutions; in theorem of unrelated infinites you consider this that at least it’s information, even if you are able to measure the actual coordinates and angles only in local infinitum).

• Number R itself is the actual number.

• Projection R’ is the number as it exists in your logic.
• You fix this most primitively with trial and error, or by some resulting science or ability of mind, for example to intuitively grasp the theorems around your number, but over time not when you need first solution. You can multiply your number with loan, also as it works like stock market: if it’s better in the future, it’s better now, but you have to work hard to have this contained in the R’.

• I = (A, O). The actual value is A but it seems O.

• O = (O, O). The value is O.

• A = (A, A). The value is A.

• E = (O, A). The actual value is O but it seems A.

• For I value, you see this rather in absolute; it’s not how you measure numbers, but the machine would see a person in worse light, consequently using it’s resources otherwere, or more deeper even attack. This is the mathematical position where negotion appears that one value is attacking the other, or attacking it’s own value. Use rather T, the automata axe, not R, the meaning - despite that in numeric system, those two are aligned to the same line and have only one axe, so the machine is defined as the goal (life). Seeing a person in worse light than they are, in degree of the mistake you also mistreat them, doing ill, for example lacking a greeting despite you greet such type of people.

• For E value, it’s rather the gold rush, carefully desribed in motive texts here where in long text, big groups go through all transformations of these values - “The Sanity Paradox: A Tale of Power, Reality, and Law”, also the unidentified genius story, those are complex stories in L (society, social groups as logecs values) and R (the individuals) - where you can grasp where Logecs would grasp some complex values in stories like Christ and Socrates, where the binary values would leave you unimpressed of the mistake, rather flegmatic.

Laegna Theorem of Hope

Introspiritual and Extrospiritual view

• The force comes from inside, and we must perfect our being. In this situation, for example instead of punishing the criminal, they would need to heal themselves, as they could not get good karma from outside force well; this is one-sided view to east.

• The society, it’s global illumination comes from enlightened souls inspiring each others, rather one is inspiring one and it has a chain reaction; there will be the karmic cyrcles, which accumulate into social effects. Notice relying only on this can be unreasonably large effort for the whole society, Earth or it’s expansion the potential star friends.

• Superpower: karma forms positive effects, from zero to power to, indeed, some superpower such as miracle or good work; for introspiritual practices, you get this personally, so you are the enlightened person.

• Karmic effect: personal Truth and Power achieved.

• Miracles: this is rather personal, such as healing with inner force or helping a friend in need; it could be sudden moment in nature. As you go on with stories, you can speculate about many miracles, and perhaps go through situations yourself which would enlighten your mind or feel vitally alive and uncommon, up to breaking some still-there little boxes made of short-term implications of physical laws and psychological archetypal stories. Mostly, enlightenment - coming to full consciousness - and mindfulness or feelings of harmony and love are considered miracles each time you are shifting towards purer forms. In Laegna language, I use the word “spectacle” for a miracle, because indeed I believe more in National Geographic with it’s miraculous views of nature and miraculous moments of life, rather than Harry Potter where I cannot understand, how the miracles are done, and where they look just plain stupid.

• The force comes from cultural effort and also, from outer enforcement. Intellectual (vs. Intelligent as in introspiritual realm) would learn a small, specialized area and discuss it in efficient manner, and the science appear far above them on it’s own. Here, while a criminal, once stopped, would have not made good karma or shown any brilliance on it’s own, the people saved would definitely benefit from good karma, but the real argument comes..

• The person, their personal illumination comes from access to libraries, education and (a little influenced by east) lifetime growth programs. Still, noticeably within singularity of such systems the “gray mass” appears, to be criticized - people, who rather look the same and think the same. Often, they have read the same schoolbook and not got much personal education.

• Superpower: not the nation nor the politician gets it personally, for it’s the circular effect of collective karma. The superpowers appear, mythologically containing both aliens and miracles, such as aliens and miracles in introspiritual mythos would be; but appearing rather as collective effects, such as Men in Black would be famous cinema example - comparative to rather introspiritual cinema examples such as Matrix, based on rather modern Buddhist story. The karmic energy comes mostly from circular effects of energetic amplifications, and the energy-efficiency exists in many areas such as civilized efforts, business climate and open science or GPL licences and free software; but also in police-controlled crimes and recovering criminals, which would add energy from the lowest, and forcefully (unlike conventional western Buddhist). The force feedback mechanism with second proof of karma would remind, that while Buddhist karma provides direct amplification to his actions, the Christian karma rather comes from grand complexes of human life, and is fed back to them - a little person, part of gray mass, rarely aware of this. Imaginary unit is creating the karma, and thus benefitting.

• Karmic effect: karma acquired by social structures, collectives and oscillations of images of civilization (such as flags, anthems and it’s official structures - men in black is good example about how enlightened force would hire people and look rather like officials).

• Miracles: in addition to miracle childs, miracles happen such as business miracles, political miracles for example human rights etc. Instead of each short story having good end as in pre-historic forms of Shamanism, rather the basis is generalized and done undone (Tao), so that each story in general framework does not even reach the problems of fairy tales easily, and they definitely win in front of the well-understood laws or the (actual, at given time, which might be measured generations later) third world countries.

• Buddhists, in general, started to learn the atheist science enlightenment, finding many parallels such as Buddha Meditating in Neutral Stance. They might welcome ideas like Zion, to adapt the spiritual parts of “Christianity” (Judeo-Christian-Islamic “trinity” [neutrally, the logical concept appearing in Christianity in this text, where I use it second time - simple logical concept is “three paradigms to the same concept”] is indeed completely authority-controlled force, so you can use any of them; abrahamic religions definitely apply some same ideas, truly coming from authority of God or Objective Reality; and their ideas persist in the scientifications of the nations); perhaps Buddhist would see close truth in Matrix.

• Christians and Atheists, at some point of time, started to collect ideas from the east, specifically from Buddhist and other sources, and rejuvelate them with science; waves after waves, with breaks, the freedom of Buddhist mind becomes popular to enrich the western culture with more personal participiation and energy of creating. We can see their collective superpowers also recognize the kind of eastern enlightened mind.

• Superpower: people, who are personally “god-like”, would exist in society, where “real God exists” (the collective union or shared Truth or Superpower, in this atheist degree, or in religious forms, the following of God with no reason - against which I argued in Laegna, but once your visions of God are realistic in terms of your science to understand the will of God based on scientific properties of unions, synchronizations and collective integrals).

• Karmic Effect: as the Yang of God outside is aligned with the Yin of God inside; the energy has started from the root and rised to the chrown in a buddhist metaphor, it’s illuminated from frequency I to E - both Sangha (Buddhist family) and Illuminati or Cabal or another form of “good” secret society (More Collective family) appears out of the common actions of the people, where each relation gets the karmic cycle to become enforced; while you do not upgrade your science to reflect a little more complex combinations and possibilities, you talk of miracles.

• Miracles: they must be multifaceted, where your personal miracle - a good flow of a day, a love and truth story on personal or rather collective level - is aligned with the equally miraculous flow of the force of such united society; where having each frequency instead of some extreme polarity would enrichen you.